Can VLMs Assess Similarity Between Graph Visualizations?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Graph visualizations have been studied for tasks such as clustering and temporal analysis, but how these visual similarities relate to established graph similarity measures remains unclear. In this paper, we explore the potential of Vision Language Models (VLMs) to approximate human-like perception of graph similarity. We generate graph datasets of various sizes and densities and compare VLM-derived visual similarity scores with feature-based measures. Our findings indicate VLMs can assess graph similarity in a manner similar to feature-based measures, even though differences among the measures exist. In future work, we plan to extend our research by conducting experiments on human visual graph perception.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Apr 2025.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Seeing Graphs Like Humans: Benchmarking Computational Measures and MLLMs for Similarity Assessment ↗
- 2024VisGraphVar: A Benchmark Generator for Assessing Variability in Graph Analysis Using Large Vision-Language Models
- 2025Do Vision-Language Models See Visualizations Like Humans? Alignment in Chart Categorization
- 2025Graph-to-Vision: Multi-graph Understanding and Reasoning using Vision-Language Models
- 2024Understanding Graphical Perception in Data Visualization through Zero-shot Prompting of Vision-Language Models
- 2025Evaluating Graphical Perception with Multimodal LLMs
- 2026One Model, Many Graphs: Learning over Attributed Graphs across Heterogeneous Modalities with Vision-Language Models
- 2026When Vision Meets Graphs: A Survey on Graph Reasoning and Learning