Double Machine Learning for Causal Inference under Shared-State Interference
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Researchers and practitioners often wish to measure treatment effects in settings where units interact via markets and recommendation systems. In these settings, units are affected by certain shared states, like prices, algorithmic recommendations or social signals. We formalize this structure, calling it shared-state interference, and argue that our formulation captures many relevant applied settings. Our key modeling assumption is that individuals' potential outcomes are independent conditional on the shared state. We then prove an extension of a double machine learning (DML) theorem providing conditions for achieving efficient inference under shared-state interference. We also instantiate our general theorem in several models of interest where it is possible to efficiently estimate the average direct effect (ADE) or global average treatment effect (GATE).
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Apr 2025.
Builds on
23 of 49 references.
References · 23
- 2023Prediction-Powered Inferencecited by 220
- 2022Semiparametric doubly robust targeted double machine learning: a reviewcited by 133
- 2015Nonparametric methods for doubly robust estimation of continuous treatment effectscited by 64
- 2014Design and analysis of experiments in networks: Reducing bias from interferencecited by 42
- 2020Experimental Design in Two-Sided Platforms: An Analysis of Biascited by 39
- 2020Design and Analysis of Switchback Experimentscited by 38
- 2017Causal inference for social network datacited by 31
- 2024Applied Causal Inference Powered by ML and AIcited by 30
- 2019Localized Debiased Machine Learning: Efficient Inference on Quantile Treatment Effects and Beyondcited by 23
- 2022Markovian Interference in Experimentscited by 22
- 2019Experimenting in Equilibriumcited by 16
- 2022Theoretical analysis of deep neural networks for temporally dependent observationscited by 16
11 more
- 2020Adaptive Experimental Design with Temporal Interference: A Maximum Likelihood Approachcited by 15
- 2023Correcting for Interference in Experiments: A Case Study at Douyincited by 12
- 2023Reducing Symbiosis Bias Through Better A/B Tests of Recommendation Algorithmscited by 8
- 2023Experimenting under Stochastic Congestioncited by 6
- 2016Randomization and The Pernicious Effects of Limited Budgets on Auction Experimentscited by 5
- 2022Reducing Marketplace Interference Bias Via Shadow Pricescited by 5
- 2018Central limit theorems via Stein's method for randomized experiments under interferencecited by 4
- 2024Estimating Treatment Effects under Algorithmic Interference: A Structured Neural Networks Approachcited by 3
- 2020Spillover Effects in Experimental Datacited by 2
- 2024Semiparametric inference for impulse response functions using double/debiased machine learningcited by 2
- 2022Treatment Effect Estimation with Observational Network Data using Machine Learningcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2025Choosing the Better Bandit Algorithm under Data Sharing: When Do A/B Experiments Work?cited by 4
- 2025Extending Prediction-Powered Inference through Conformal Predictioncited by 2
- 2025Estimating Treatment Effects with Independent Component Analysiscited by 0
- 2026Adaptive Estimation and Inference in Semi-parametric Heterogeneous Clustered Multitask Learning via Neyman Orthogonalitycited by 0
- 2026Adaptive Estimation and Inference in Semi-parametric Heterogeneous Clustered Multitask Learning via Neyman Orthogonality3 May 2026
- 2025Extending Prediction-Powered Inference through Conformal Prediction17 Oct 2025
- 2025Estimating Treatment Effects with Independent Component Analysis22 Jul 2025
- 2025Choosing the Better Bandit Algorithm under Data Sharing: When Do A/B Experiments Work?16 Jul 2025