mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MicroNAS: An Automated Framework for Developing a Fall Detection System

arXiv 2504.07397 ↗First posted 10 Apr 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This work presents MicroNAS, an automated neural architecture search tool specifically designed to create models optimized for microcontrollers with small memory resources. The ESP32 microcontroller, with 320 KB of memory, is used as the target platform. The artificial intelligence contribution lies in a novel method for optimizing convolutional neural network and gated recurrent unit architectures by considering the memory size of the target microcontroller as a guide. A comparison is made between memory-driven model optimization and traditional two-stage methods, which use pruning, to show the effectiveness of the proposed framework. To demonstrate the engineering application of MicroNAS, a fall detection system (FDS) for lower-limb amputees is developed as a pilot study. A critical challenge in fall detection studies, class imbalance in the dataset, is addressed. The results show that MicroNAS models achieved higher F1-scores than alternative approaches, such as ensemble methods and H2O Automated Machine Learning, presenting a significant step forward in real-time FDS development. Biomechanists using body-worn sensors for activity detection can adopt the open-source code to design machine learning models tailored for microcontroller platforms with limited memory.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 83 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Apr 2025.

Builds on

19 of 83 references.

References · 19

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2020Designing Network Design Spacescited by 954
  3. 2017To prune, or not to prune: exploring the efficacy of pruning for model compressioncited by 596
  4. 2016Quantized Neural Networks: Training Neural Networks with Low Precision Weights and Activationscited by 413
  5. 2019AutoML: A Survey of the State-of-the-Artcited by 388
  6. 2020MCUNet: Tiny Deep Learning on IoT Devicescited by 269
  7. 2019Random Search and Reproducibility for Neural Architecture Searchcited by 253
  8. 2015Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAICcited by 110
  9. 2014Convolutional Neural Networks at Constrained Time Costcited by 81
  10. 2019On Network Design Spaces for Visual Recognitioncited by 68
  11. 2020AutoML to Date and Beyond: Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 63
  12. 2021Lost in Pruning: The Effects of Pruning Neural Networks beyond Test Accuracycited by 62
7 more
  1. 2020μNAS: Constrained Neural Architecture Search for Microcontrollerscited by 54
  2. 2022Pruning has a disparate impact on model accuracycited by 43
  3. 2019Towards Automated Machine Learning: Evaluation and Comparison of AutoML Approaches and Toolscited by 25
  4. 2023Lightweight Neural Architecture Search for Temporal Convolutional Networks at the Edgecited by 15
  5. 2016COCO: Performance Assessmentcited by 7
  6. 2022Speeding up NAS with Adaptive Subset Selectioncited by 6
  7. 2025Robust Support Vector Machines for Imbalanced and Noisy Data via Benders Decompositioncited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.