Task-Circuit Quantization: Leveraging Knowledge Localization and Interpretability for Compression
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Post-training quantization (PTQ) reduces a model's memory footprint by mapping full precision weights into low bit weights without costly retraining, but can degrade its downstream performance especially in low 2- to 3-bit settings. We develop a new mixed-precision PTQ approach, Task-Circuit Quantization (TaCQ), that draws parallels to automated circuit discovery, directly conditioning the quantization process on specific weight circuits -- which we define as sets of weights associated with downstream task performance. These weights are kept as 16-bit weights, while others are quantized, maintaining performance while only adding a marginal memory cost. Specifically, TaCQ contrasts unquantized model weights with a uniformly-quantized model to estimate the expected change in weights due to quantization and uses gradient information to predict the resulting impact on task performance, allowing us to preserve task-specific weights. We compare TaCQ-based quantization to existing mixed-precision quantization methods when conditioning both on general-purpose and task-specific data. Across QA, math reasoning, and text-to-SQL tasks for both Llama-3 and Qwen2.5, we find that TaCQ outperforms baselines using the same calibration data and a lower weight budget, achieving major improvements in the 2 and 3-bit regime. With only 3.1 bits we are able to recover 96% of Llama-3-8B-Instruct's unquantized 16-bit MMLU performance, obtaining a 5.25% absolute improvement over SPQR. We also observe consistently large gains over existing methods in the 2-bit regime, with an average gain of 14.74% over the strongest baseline, SliM-LLM. Moreover, we observe a 7.20% gain without conditioning on specific tasks, showing TaCQ's ability to identify important weights is not limited to task-conditioned settings.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Apr 2025.
Builds on
38 of 47 references.
References · 38
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
- 2022GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformerscited by 1,919
- 2018Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Taskcited by 1,139
- 2023Towards Automated Circuit Discovery for Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 724
- 2023LLM-Pruner: On the Structural Pruning of Large Language Modelscited by 650
- 2024QuaRot: Outlier-Free 4-Bit Inference in Rotated LLMscited by 634
- 2021Knowledge Neurons in Pretrained Transformerscited by 601
26 more
- 2020Pruning neural networks without any data by iteratively conserving synaptic flowcited by 479
- 2023Scissorhands: Exploiting the Persistence of Importance Hypothesis for LLM KV Cache Compression at Test Timecited by 439
- 2023OmniQuant: Omnidirectionally Calibrated Quantization for Large Language Modelscited by 424
- 2023Harnessing the Power of LLMs in Practice: A Survey on ChatGPT and Beyondcited by 411
- 2024ShortGPT: Layers in Large Language Models are More Redundant Than You Expectcited by 383
- 2023SpQR: A Sparse-Quantized Representation for Near-Lossless LLM Weight Compressioncited by 367
- 2023LLM-QAT: Data-Free Quantization Aware Training for Large Language Modelscited by 324
- 2022Optimal Brain Compression: A Framework for Accurate Post-Training Quantization and Pruningcited by 322
- 2024The Era of 1-bit LLMs: All Large Language Models are in 1.58 Bitscited by 308
- 2016Not Just a Black Box: Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 297
- 2023SqueezeLLM: Dense-and-Sparse Quantizationcited by 294
- 2024Extreme Compression of Large Language Models via Additive Quantizationcited by 232
- 2023Attribution Patching Outperforms Automated Circuit Discoverycited by 209
- 2016Layer-wise Relevance Propagation for Neural Networks with Local Renormalization Layerscited by 199
- 2024BiLLM: Pushing the Limit of Post-Training Quantization for LLMscited by 144
- 2024AtP*: An efficient and scalable method for localizing LLM behaviour to componentscited by 111
- 2023PB-LLM: Partially Binarized Large Language Modelscited by 83
- 2024SliM-LLM: Salience-Driven Mixed-Precision Quantization for Large Language Modelscited by 63
- 2024PV-Tuning: Beyond Straight-Through Estimation for Extreme LLM Compressioncited by 61
- 2023On the Impact of Calibration Data in Post-training Quantization and Pruningcited by 58
- 2024The Super Weight in Large Language Modelscited by 52
- 2024Outliers and Calibration Sets have Diminishing Effect on Quantization of Modern LLMscited by 12
- 2024Math Neurosurgery: Isolating Language Models' Math Reasoning Abilities Using Only Forward Passescited by 10
- 2024GWQ: Gradient-Aware Weight Quantization for Large Language Modelscited by 8
- 2024"Ask Me Anything": How Comcast Uses LLMs to Assist Agents in Real Timecited by 4
- 2025RSQ: Learning from Important Tokens Leads to Better Quantized LLMscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 6.
7 papers.
- 2026Locate, Steer, and Improve: A Practical Survey of Actionable Mechanistic Interpretability in Large Language Modelscited by 27
- 2025Generalized Correctness Models: Learning Calibrated and Model-Agnostic Correctness Predictors from Historical Patternscited by 5
- 2026ScaleBITS: Scalable Bitwidth Search for Hardware-Aligned Mixed-Precision LLMscited by 3
- 2026Beyond Activation Alignment:The Alignment-Diversity Tradeoff in Task-Aware LLM Quantizationcited by 1
- 2026The Structure of Quantization Damage in LLMs: Why the Next Bit Should Be Spent Globallycited by 1
- 2026Weight-Adjusted Gradients Reveal Parameter Importance and Failure Modes in LLMscited by 0
- 2026Differentiable Bit-Widths: Co-optimizing Pruning and Quantization via SVD for Ultra-Efficient LLM Compressioncited by 0
- 2026Differentiable Bit-Widths: Co-optimizing Pruning and Quantization via SVD for Ultra-Efficient LLM Compression5 Oct 2026
- 2026The Structure of Quantization Damage in LLMs: Why the Next Bit Should Be Spent Globally1 Sep 2026
- 2026Weight-Adjusted Gradients Reveal Parameter Importance and Failure Modes in LLMs12 Jul 2026
- 2026Beyond Activation Alignment:The Alignment-Diversity Tradeoff in Task-Aware LLM Quantization1 Jul 2026
- 2026ScaleBITS: Scalable Bitwidth Search for Hardware-Aligned Mixed-Precision LLMs6 Feb 2026
- 2026Locate, Steer, and Improve: A Practical Survey of Actionable Mechanistic Interpretability in Large Language Models20 Jan 2026
- 2025Generalized Correctness Models: Learning Calibrated and Model-Agnostic Correctness Predictors from Historical Patterns29 Sep 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025You Had One Job: Per-Task Quantization Using LLMs' Hidden Representations
- 2026Forgetting That Sticks: Quantization-Permanent Unlearning via Circuit Attribution
- 2025Task-Stratified Knowledge Scaling Laws for Post-Training Quantized Large Language Models
- 2026What Makes Low-Bit Quantization-Aware Training Work for Reasoning LLMs? A Systematic Study
- 2025Quantization Meets Reasoning: Exploring and Mitigating Degradation of Low-Bit LLMs in Mathematical Reasoning
- 2025Quantization Meets Reasoning: Exploring LLM Low-Bit Quantization Degradation for Mathematical Reasoning
- 2024Exploring the Trade-Offs: Quantization Methods, Task Difficulty, and Model Size in Large Language Models From Edge to Giant
- 2023Enhancing Computation Efficiency in Large Language Models through Weight and Activation Quantization