Detecting AI-generated Artwork
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The high efficiency and quality of artwork generated by Artificial Intelligence (AI) has created new concerns and challenges for human artists. In particular, recent improvements in generative AI have made it difficult for people to distinguish between human-generated and AI-generated art. In this research, we consider the potential utility of various types of Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) models in distinguishing AI-generated artwork from human-generated artwork. We focus on three challenging artistic styles, namely, baroque, cubism, and expressionism. The learning models we test are Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). Our best experimental results yield a multiclass accuracy of 0.8208 over six classes, and an impressive accuracy of 0.9758 for the binary classification problem of distinguishing AI-generated from human-generated art.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Apr 2025.
Builds on
2 of 15 references.
References · 2
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,777
- 2022Shifted Diffusion for Text-to-image Generationcited by 37
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
- 2026Robustness of AI-Art Detectors under Generator Shift12 Aug 2026
- 2026AI-generated Images Challenge Visual Trust in High-risk Scenarios23 Jul 2026