A Geometric-Aware Perspective and Beyond: Hybrid Quantum-Classical Machine Learning Methods
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Geometric Machine Learning (GML) has shown that respecting non-Euclidean geometry in data spaces can significantly improve performance over naive Euclidean assumptions. In parallel, Quantum Machine Learning (QML) has emerged as a promising paradigm that leverages superposition, entanglement, and interference within quantum state manifolds for learning tasks. This paper offers a unifying perspective by casting QML as a specialized yet more expressive branch of GML. We argue that quantum states, whether pure or mixed, reside on curved manifolds (e.g., projective Hilbert spaces or density-operator manifolds), mirroring how covariance matrices inhabit the manifold of symmetric positive definite (SPD) matrices or how image sets occupy Grassmann manifolds. However, QML also benefits from purely quantum properties, such as entanglement-induced curvature, that can yield richer kernel structures and more nuanced data embeddings. We illustrate these ideas with published and newly discussed results, including hybrid classical -quantum pipelines for diabetic foot ulcer classification and structural health monitoring. Despite near-term hardware limitations that constrain purely quantum solutions, hybrid architectures already demonstrate tangible benefits by combining classical manifold-based feature extraction with quantum embeddings. We present a detailed mathematical treatment of the geometrical underpinnings of quantum states, emphasizing parallels to classical Riemannian geometry and manifold-based optimization. Finally, we outline open research challenges and future directions, including Quantum Large Language Models (LLMs), quantum reinforcement learning, and emerging hardware approaches, demonstrating how synergizing GML and QML principles can unlock the next generation of machine intelligence.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Apr 2025.
Builds on
11 of 40 references.
References · 11
- 2016Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutionscited by 2,332
- 2016Geometric deep learning: going beyond Euclidean datacited by 1,048
- 2017Poincar'e Embeddings for Learning Hierarchical Representationscited by 684
- 2018Supervised learning with quantum enhanced feature spacescited by 665
- 2021GRAND: Graph Neural Diffusioncited by 258
- 2016A Riemannian Network for SPD Matrix Learningcited by 162
- 2019Quantum Natural Gradientcited by 106
- 2016Quantum-enhanced machine learningcited by 79
- 2013Sparse Coding and Dictionary Learning for Symmetric Positive Definite Matrices: A Kernel Approachcited by 9
- 2015Efficient Clustering on Riemannian Manifolds: A Kernelised Random Projection Approachcited by 1
- 2021Hybrid Classical-Quantum method for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Classificationcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Quantum Data Encoding and Variational Algorithms: A Framework for Hybrid Quantum Classical Machine Learning
- 2024Machine Learning and Quantum Intelligence for Health Data Scenarios
- 2025A Primer on Quantum Machine Learning
- 2025Quantum Machine Learning in Multi-Qubit Phase-Space Part I: Foundations
- 2023Quantum-Inspired Machine Learning: a Survey
- 2025Investigating Quantum Feature Maps in Quantum Support Vector Machines for Lung Cancer Classification
- 2021Manifold learning via quantum dynamics
- 2024Inference, interference and invariance: How the Quantum Fourier Transform can help to learn from data