mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Correcting Class Imbalances with Self-Training for Improved Universal Lesion Detection and Tagging

arXiv 2504.05207 ↗First posted 7 Apr 2025cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Universal lesion detection and tagging (ULDT) in CT studies is critical for tumor burden assessment and tracking the progression of lesion status (growth/shrinkage) over time. However, a lack of fully annotated data hinders the development of effective ULDT approaches. Prior work used the DeepLesion dataset (4,427 patients, 10,594 studies, 32,120 CT slices, 32,735 lesions, 8 body part labels) for algorithmic development, but this dataset is not completely annotated and contains class imbalances. To address these issues, in this work, we developed a self-training pipeline for ULDT. A VFNet model was trained on a limited 11.5% subset of DeepLesion (bounding boxes + tags) to detect and classify lesions in CT studies. Then, it identified and incorporated novel lesion candidates from a larger unseen data subset into its training set, and self-trained itself over multiple rounds. Multiple self-training experiments were conducted with different threshold policies to select predicted lesions with higher quality and cover the class imbalances. We discovered that direct self-training improved the sensitivities of over-represented lesion classes at the expense of under-represented classes. However, upsampling the lesions mined during self-training along with a variable threshold policy yielded a 6.5% increase in sensitivity at 4 FP in contrast to self-training without class balancing (72% vs 78.5%) and a 11.7% increase compared to the same self-training policy without upsampling (66.8% vs 78.5%). Furthermore, we show that our results either improved or maintained the sensitivity at 4FP for all 8 lesion classes.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2025.

Builds on

16 of 22 references.

References · 16

  1. 2020Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 3,422
  2. 2021YOLOX: Exceeding YOLO Series in 2021cited by 1,071
  3. 2020VarifocalNet: An IoU-aware Dense Object Detectorcited by 231
  4. 2020Learning from Multiple Datasets with Heterogeneous and Partial Labels for Universal Lesion Detection in CTcited by 42
  5. 2019MULAN: Multitask Universal Lesion Analysis Network for Joint Lesion Detection, Tagging, and Segmentationcited by 39
  6. 2020Improving Object Detection with Selective Self-supervised Self-trainingcited by 35
  7. 2019Improving RetinaNet for CT Lesion Detection with Dense Masks from Weak RECIST Labelscited by 29
  8. 20183D Context Enhanced Region-based Convolutional Neural Network for End-to-End Lesion Detectioncited by 24
  9. 2019ULDor: A Universal Lesion Detector for CT Scans with Pseudo Masks and Hard Negative Example Miningcited by 21
  10. 2019Holistic and Comprehensive Annotation of Clinically Significant Findings on Diverse CT Images: Learning from Radiology Reports and Label Ontologycited by 18
  11. 2022SATr: Slice Attention with Transformer for Universal Lesion Detectioncited by 17
  12. 2021Asymmetric 3D Context Fusion for Universal Lesion Detectioncited by 14
4 more
  1. 2020AlignShift: Bridging the Gap of Imaging Thickness in 3D Anisotropic Volumescited by 13
  2. 2020Lesion Harvester: Iteratively Mining Unlabeled Lesions and Hard-Negative Examples at Scalecited by 11
  3. 2021Universal Lesion Detection in CT Scans using Neural Network Ensemblescited by 8
  4. 2021RECIST-Net: Lesion detection via grouping keypoints on RECIST-based annotationcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.