Stereo-LiDAR Fusion by Semi-Global Matching With Discrete Disparity-Matching Cost and Semidensification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present a real-time, non-learning depth estimation method that fuses Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data with stereo camera input. Our approach comprises three key techniques: Semi-Global Matching (SGM) stereo with Discrete Disparity-matching Cost (DDC), semidensification of LiDAR disparity, and a consistency check that combines stereo images and LiDAR data. Each of these components is designed for parallelization on a GPU to realize real-time performance. When it was evaluated on the KITTI dataset, the proposed method achieved an error rate of 2.79%, outperforming the previous state-of-the-art real-time stereo-LiDAR fusion method, which had an error rate of 3.05%. Furthermore, we tested the proposed method in various scenarios, including different LiDAR point densities, varying weather conditions, and indoor environments, to demonstrate its high adaptability. We believe that the real-time and non-learning nature of our method makes it highly practical for applications in robotics and automation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 52 of its 110 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2025.
Builds on
52 of 110 references.
References · 52
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
- 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 2,212
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
- 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,998
- 2021Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Bettercited by 714
- 2017The NarrativeQA Reading Comprehension Challengecited by 597
38 more
- 2021FinQA: A Dataset of Numerical Reasoning over Financial Datacited by 562
- 2021Large Language Models Can Be Strong Differentially Private Learnerscited by 412
- 2021Differentially Private Fine-tuning of Language Modelscited by 400
- 2023Towards Expert-Level Medical Question Answering with Large Language Modelscited by 384
- 2023Can LLMs Keep a Secret? Testing Privacy Implications of Language Models via Contextual Integrity Theorycited by 230
- 2022ConvFinQA: Exploring the Chain of Numerical Reasoning in Conversational Finance Question Answeringcited by 196
- 2022What Does it Mean for a Language Model to Preserve Privacy?cited by 195
- 2019Privacy- and Utility-Preserving Textual Analysis via Calibrated Multivariate Perturbationscited by 119
- 2021Large-Scale Differentially Private BERTcited by 118
- 2022ChatGPT Makes Medicine Easy to Swallow: An Exploratory Case Study on Simplified Radiology Reportscited by 101
- 2023Privacy-Preserving In-Context Learning with Differentially Private Few-Shot Generationcited by 96
- 2023Identifying and Mitigating the Security Risks of Generative AIcited by 91
- 2023Watermarks in the Sand: Impossibility of Strong Watermarking for Generative Modelscited by 87
- 2017Ethical Challenges in Data-Driven Dialogue Systemscited by 86
- 2023Flocks of Stochastic Parrots: Differentially Private Prompt Learning for Large Language Modelscited by 83
- 2023Publicly-Detectable Watermarking for Language Modelscited by 76
- 2023UniversalNER: Targeted Distillation from Large Language Models for Open Named Entity Recognitioncited by 72
- 2020Training Production Language Models without Memorizing User Datacited by 68
- 2022The Limits of Word Level Differential Privacycited by 63
- 2023Locally Differentially Private Document Generation Using Zero Shot Promptingcited by 63
- 2021Selective Differential Privacy for Language Modelingcited by 62
- 2022THE-X: Privacy-Preserving Transformer Inference with Homomorphic Encryptioncited by 57
- 2023DP-OPT: Make Large Language Model Your Privacy-Preserving Prompt Engineercited by 57
- 2024PAPILLON: Privacy Preservation from Internet-based and Local Language Model Ensemblescited by 57
- 2018Generalised Differential Privacy for Text Document Processingcited by 52
- 2022A Customized Text Sanitization Mechanism with Differential Privacycited by 52
- 2019Leveraging Hierarchical Representations for Preserving Privacy and Utility in Textcited by 50
- 2021TEM: High Utility Metric Differential Privacy on Textcited by 43
- 2023Hide and Seek (HaS): A Lightweight Framework for Prompt Privacy Protectioncited by 38
- 2023Split-and-Denoise: Protect large language model inference with local differential privacycited by 32
- 2023DP-BART for Privatized Text Rewriting under Local Differential Privacycited by 28
- 2023Protecting User Privacy in Remote Conversational Systems: A Privacy-Preserving framework based on text sanitizationcited by 23
- 2023New Era of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Towards a Sustainable Multifaceted Revolutioncited by 20
- 2023A Paradigm Shift: The Future of Machine Translation Lies with Large Language Modelscited by 19
- 2023Guiding Text-to-Text Privatization by Syntaxcited by 14
- 2023Driving Context into Text-to-Text Privatizationcited by 13
- 2024The Fire Thief Is Also the Keeper: Balancing Usability and Privacy in Promptscited by 13
- 2022Attacks on Deidentification's Defensescited by 11
50 most cited of 52 All 52 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.