Few Dimensions are Enough: Fine-tuning BERT with Selected Dimensions Revealed Its Redundant Nature
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
When fine-tuning BERT models for specific tasks, it is common to select part of the final layer's output and input it into a newly created fully connected layer. However, it remains unclear which part of the final layer should be selected and what information each dimension of the layers holds. In this study, we comprehensively investigated the effectiveness and redundancy of token vectors, layers, and dimensions through BERT fine-tuning on GLUE tasks. The results showed that outputs other than the CLS vector in the final layer contain equivalent information, most tasks require only 2-3 dimensions, and while the contribution of lower layers decreases, there is little difference among higher layers. We also evaluated the impact of freezing pre-trained layers and conducted cross-fine-tuning, where fine-tuning is applied sequentially to different tasks. The findings suggest that hidden layers may change significantly during fine-tuning, BERT has considerable redundancy, enabling it to handle multiple tasks simultaneously, and its number of dimensions may be excessive.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2025.
Builds on
29 of 42 references.
References · 29
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,326
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
- 2017Positive-Unlabeled Learning with Non-Negative Risk Estimatorcited by 219
- 2018Learning from positive and unlabeled data: a surveycited by 219
- 2019A Unified MRC Framework for Named Entity Recognitioncited by 199
- 2023GPT-NER: Named Entity Recognition via Large Language Modelscited by 160
- 2020BOND: BERT-Assisted Open-Domain Named Entity Recognition with Distant Supervisioncited by 91
- 2020Automated Concatenation of Embeddings for Structured Predictioncited by 86
17 more
- 2021Improving Named Entity Recognition by External Context Retrieving and Cooperative Learningcited by 76
- 2018Learning Named Entity Tagger using Domain-Specific Dictionarycited by 65
- 2019Distantly Supervised Named Entity Recognition using Positive-Unlabeled Learningcited by 46
- 2017Weakly Supervised Cross-Lingual Named Entity Recognition via Effective Annotation and Representation Projectioncited by 36
- 2023PromptNER: Prompting For Named Entity Recognitioncited by 35
- 2018Classification from Positive, Unlabeled and Biased Negative Datacited by 34
- 2019Low-Resource Name Tagging Learned with Weakly Labeled Datacited by 32
- 2021Noisy-Labeled NER with Confidence Estimationcited by 28
- 2019Named Entity Recognition with Partially Annotated Training Datacited by 27
- 2017Scientific Information Extraction with Semi-supervised Neural Taggingcited by 24
- 2021De-biasing Distantly Supervised Named Entity Recognition via Causal Interventioncited by 24
- 2022Distantly Supervised Named Entity Recognition via Confidence-Based Multi-Class Positive and Unlabeled Learningcited by 21
- 2023Self-Improving for Zero-Shot Named Entity Recognition with Large Language Modelscited by 15
- 2019End-to-end Named Entity Recognition and Relation Extraction using Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 11
- 2021Partially Supervised Named Entity Recognition via the Expected Entity Ratio Losscited by 7
- 2023SANTA: Separate Strategies for Inaccurate and Incomplete Annotation Noise in Distantly-Supervised Named Entity Recognitioncited by 4
- 2023Positive-unlabeled learning for binary and multi-class cell detection in histopathology images with incomplete annotationscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.