mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Interpretable Multimodal Learning for Tumor Protein-Metal Binding: Progress, Challenges, and Perspectives

arXiv 2504.03847 ↗First posted 4 Apr 2025q-bio.QM cs.LG q-bio.BMcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In cancer therapeutics, protein-metal binding mechanisms critically govern the pharmacokinetics and targeting efficacy of drugs, thereby fundamentally shaping the rational design of anticancer metallodrugs. While conventional laboratory methods used to study such mechanisms are often costly, low throughput, and limited in capturing dynamic biological processes, machine learning (ML) has emerged as a promising alternative. Despite increasing efforts to develop protein-metal binding datasets and ML algorithms, the application of ML in tumor protein-metal binding remains limited. Key challenges include a shortage of high-quality, tumor-specific datasets, insufficient consideration of multiple data modalities, and the complexity of interpreting results due to the ''black box'' nature of complex ML models. This paper summarizes recent progress and ongoing challenges in using ML to predict tumor protein-metal binding, focusing on data, modeling, and interpretability. We present multimodal protein-metal binding datasets and outline strategies for acquiring, curating, and preprocessing them for training ML models. Moreover, we explore the complementary value provided by different data modalities and examine methods for their integration. We also review approaches for improving model interpretability to support more trustworthy decisions in cancer research. Finally, we offer our perspective on research opportunities and propose strategies to address the scarcity of tumor protein data and the limited number of predictive models for tumor protein-metal binding. We also highlight two promising directions for effective metal-based drug design: integrating protein-protein interaction data to provide structural insights into metal-binding events and predicting structural changes in tumor proteins after metal binding.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 176 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Apr 2025.

Builds on

30 of 176 references.

References · 30

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  3. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  4. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  5. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  6. 2019BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text miningcited by 1,947
  7. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
  8. 2019SciBERT: A Pretrained Language Model for Scientific Textcited by 1,414
  9. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
  10. 2017Multimodal Machine Learning: A Survey and Taxonomycited by 1,013
  11. 2024Sparse Feature Circuits: Discovering and Editing Interpretable Causal Graphs in Language Modelscited by 435
  12. 2021Towards Understanding and Mitigating Social Biases in Language Modelscited by 296
18 more
  1. 2018Deep k-Nearest Neighbors: Towards Confident, Interpretable and Robust Deep Learningcited by 207
  2. 2022Interpretable Scientific Discovery with Symbolic Regression: A Reviewcited by 105
  3. 2020BERTology Meets Biology: Interpreting Attention in Protein Language Modelscited by 85
  4. 2023Modular Deep Learningcited by 83
  5. 2024Scientific Large Language Models: A Survey on Biological & Chemical Domainscited by 80
  6. 2023ProtST: Multi-Modality Learning of Protein Sequences and Biomedical Textscited by 78
  7. 2021IAIA-BL: A Case-based Interpretable Deep Learning Model for Classification of Mass Lesions in Digital Mammographycited by 72
  8. 2022Concept Activation Regions: A Generalized Framework For Concept-Based Explanationscited by 57
  9. 2020How Interpretable and Trustworthy are GAMs?cited by 44
  10. 2023A Perspective on Explainable Artificial Intelligence Methods: SHAP and LIMEcited by 42
  11. 2021Explaining Hyperparameter Optimization via Partial Dependence Plotscited by 35
  12. 2021Explaining Latent Representations with a Corpus of Examplescited by 30
  13. 2023Designing Interpretable ML System to Enhance Trust in Healthcare: A Systematic Review to Proposed Responsible Clinician-AI-Collaboration Frameworkcited by 11
  14. 2020Relation Extraction from Biomedical and Clinical Text: Unified Multitask Learning Frameworkcited by 8
  15. 2019Towards a Unified Evaluation of Explanation Methods without Ground Truthcited by 6
  16. 2022The Rise of GitHub in Scholarly Publicationscited by 4
  17. 2024OneProt: Towards Multi-Modal Protein Foundation Modelscited by 2
  18. 2025Classifying the Stoichiometry of Virus-like Particles with Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.