mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Graph Transformer-Based Flood Susceptibility Mapping: Application to the French Riviera and Railway Infrastructure Under Climate Change

arXiv 2504.03727 ↗First posted 31 Mar 2025eess.SP cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Increasing flood frequency and severity due to climate change threatens infrastructure and demands improved susceptibility mapping techniques. While traditional machine learning (ML) approaches are widely used, they struggle to capture spatial dependencies and poor boundary delineation between susceptibility classes. This study introduces the first application of a graph transformer (GT) architecture for flood susceptibility mapping to the flood-prone French Riviera (e.g., 2020 Storm Alex) using topography, hydrology, geography, and environmental data. GT incorporates watershed topology using Laplacian positional encoders (PEs) and attention mechanisms. The developed GT model has an AUC-ROC (0.9739), slightly lower than XGBoost (0.9853). However, the GT model demonstrated better clustering and delineation with a higher Moran's I value (0.6119) compared to the random forest (0.5775) and XGBoost (0.5311) with p-value lower than 0.0001. Feature importance revealed a striking consistency across models, with elevation, slope, distance to channel, and convergence index being the critical factors. Dimensionality reduction on Laplacian PEs revealed partial clusters, indicating they could capture spatial information; however, their importance was lower than flood factors. Since climate and land use changes aggravate flood risk, susceptibility maps are developed for the 2050 year under different Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) and railway track vulnerability is assessed. All RCP scenarios revealed increased area across susceptibility classes, except for the very low category. RCP 8.5 projections indicate that 17.46% of the watershed area and 54% of railway length fall within very-high susceptible zones, compared to 6.19% and 35.61%, respectively, under current conditions. The developed maps can be integrated into a multi-hazard framework.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 87 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Mar 2025.

Builds on

15 of 87 references.

References · 15

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  3. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  4. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  5. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  6. 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,487
  7. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
  8. 2018Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,576
  9. 2019Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be Prunedcited by 856
  10. 2019Are Sixteen Heads Really Better than One?cited by 816
  11. 2020A Generalization of Transformer Networks to Graphscited by 661
  12. 2018All Models are Wrong, but Many are Useful: Learning a Variable's Importance by Studying an Entire Class of Prediction Models Simultaneouslycited by 373
3 more
  1. 2016Visualizing the Effects of Predictor Variables in Black Box Supervised Learning Modelscited by 213
  2. 2023Stabilizing Transformer Training by Preventing Attention Entropy Collapsecited by 161
  3. 2019Flood Prediction Using Machine Learning Models: Literature Reviewcited by 36

Built on by

Not cited yet.