Timeseries Foundation Models for Mobility: A Benchmark Comparison with Traditional and Deep Learning Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Crowd and flow predictions have been extensively studied in mobility data science. Traditional forecasting methods have relied on statistical models such as ARIMA, later supplemented by deep learning approaches like ST-ResNet. More recently, foundation models for time series forecasting, such as TimeGPT, Chronos, and LagLlama, have emerged. A key advantage of these models is their ability to generate zero-shot predictions, allowing them to be applied directly to new tasks without retraining. This study evaluates the performance of TimeGPT compared to traditional approaches for predicting city-wide mobility timeseries using two bike-sharing datasets from New York City and Vienna, Austria. Model performance is assessed across short (1-hour), medium (12-hour), and long-term (24-hour) forecasting horizons. The results highlight the potential of foundation models for mobility forecasting while also identifying limitations of our experiments.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Mar 2025.
Builds on
5 of 16 references.
References · 5
- 2024Chronos: Learning the Language of Time Seriescited by 759
- 2016Deep Spatio-Temporal Residual Networks for Citywide Crowd Flows Predictioncited by 333
- 2021DL-Traff: Survey and Benchmark of Deep Learning Models for Urban Traffic Predictioncited by 73
- 2020Coupled Layer-wise Graph Convolution for Transportation Demand Predictioncited by 54
- 2024Diffusion Transformers as Open-World Spatiotemporal Foundation Modelscited by 10
Built on by
Not cited yet.