Hallucination Detection on a Budget: Efficient Bayesian Estimation of Semantic Entropy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Detecting whether an LLM hallucinates is an important research challenge. One promising way of doing so is to estimate the semantic entropy (Farquhar et al., 2024) of the distribution of generated sequences. We propose a new algorithm for doing that, with two main advantages. First, due to us taking the Bayesian approach, we achieve a much better quality of semantic entropy estimates for a given budget of samples from the LLM. Second, we are able to tune the number of samples adaptively so that `harder' contexts receive more samples. We demonstrate empirically that our approach systematically beats the baselines, requiring only 53% of samples used by Farquhar et al. (2024) to achieve the same quality of hallucination detection as measured by AUROC. Moreover, quite counterintuitively, our estimator is useful even with just one sample from the LLM.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Apr 2025.
Builds on
18 of 30 references.
References · 18
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
- 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
- 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,783
- 2020On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 895
- 2021Are NLP Models really able to Solve Simple Math Word Problems?cited by 861
- 2017Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Datacited by 812
- 2023Semantic Uncertainty: Linguistic Invariances for Uncertainty Estimation in Natural Language Generationcited by 795
- 2019Latent Retrieval for Weakly Supervised Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 691
- 2024INSIDE: LLMs' Internal States Retain the Power of Hallucination Detectioncited by 317
- 2024Semantic Entropy Probes: Robust and Cheap Hallucination Detection in LLMscited by 246
6 more
- 2024Kernel Language Entropy: Fine-grained Uncertainty Quantification for LLMs from Semantic Similaritiescited by 156
- 2024To Believe or Not to Believe Your LLMcited by 120
- 2024What Large Language Models Know and What People Think They Knowcited by 109
- 2020Controlled Hallucinations: Learning to Generate Faithfully from Noisy Datacited by 83
- 2024Quantifying Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty with Proper Scoring Rulescited by 21
- 2024Rethinking Uncertainty Estimation in LLMs: A Principled Single-Sequence Measurecited by 18
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026"I May Not Have Articulated Myself Clearly": Diagnosing Dynamic Instability in LLM Reasoning at Inference Timecited by 1
- 2026TriLens: Per-Layer Logit-Lens Entropy for White-Box Hallucination Detectioncited by 1
- 2026Operadic consistency: a label-free signal for compositional reasoning failures in LLMscited by 0
- 2026The Commit-Abstain Circuit: Why Language Models Hallucinate Instead of Abstainingcited by 0
- 2026The Commit-Abstain Circuit: Why Language Models Hallucinate Instead of Abstaining26 Sep 2026
- 2026Operadic consistency: a label-free signal for compositional reasoning failures in LLMs11 Jun 2026
- 2026TriLens: Per-Layer Logit-Lens Entropy for White-Box Hallucination Detection31 May 2026
- 2026"I May Not Have Articulated Myself Clearly": Diagnosing Dynamic Instability in LLM Reasoning at Inference Time2 Feb 2026