mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On the Complexities of Testing for Compliance with Human Oversight Requirements in AI Regulation

arXiv 2504.03300 ↗First posted 4 Apr 2025cs.HC cs.CYcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Human oversight requirements are a core component of the European AI Act and in AI governance. In this paper, we highlight key challenges in testing for compliance with these requirements. A central difficulty lies in balancing simple, but potentially ineffective checklist-based approaches with resource-intensive and context-sensitive empirical testing of the effectiveness of human oversight of AI. Questions regarding when to update compliance testing, the context-dependent nature of human oversight requirements, and difficult-to-operationalize standards further complicate compliance testing. We argue that these challenges illustrate broader challenges in the future of sociotechnical AI governance, i.e. a future that shifts from ensuring good technological products to good sociotechnical systems.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Apr 2025.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.