mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Safe Screening Rules for Group OWL Models

arXiv 2504.03152 ↗First posted 4 Apr 2025cs.LG stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Group Ordered Weighted L1-Norm (Group OWL) regularized models have emerged as a useful procedure for high-dimensional sparse multi-task learning with correlated features. Proximal gradient methods are used as standard approaches to solving Group OWL models. However, Group OWL models usually suffer huge computational costs and memory usage when the feature size is large in the high-dimensional scenario. To address this challenge, in this paper, we are the first to propose the safe screening rule for Group OWL models by effectively tackling the structured non-separable penalty, which can quickly identify the inactive features that have zero coefficients across all the tasks. Thus, by removing the inactive features during the training process, we may achieve substantial computational gain and memory savings. More importantly, the proposed screening rule can be directly integrated with the existing solvers both in the batch and stochastic settings. Theoretically, we prove our screening rule is safe and also can be safely applied to the existing iterative optimization algorithms. Our experimental results demonstrate that our screening rule can effectively identify the inactive features and leads to a significant computational speedup without any loss of accuracy.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Apr 2025.

Builds on

17 of 44 references.

References · 17

  1. 2018Multi-Task Learning as Multi-Objective Optimizationcited by 809
  2. 2016Cross-stitch Networks for Multi-task Learningcited by 466
  3. 2019Pareto Multi-Task Learningcited by 224
  4. 2015The Benefit of Multitask Representation Learningcited by 194
  5. 2016Gap Safe screening rules for sparsity enforcing penaltiescited by 38
  6. 2014SLOPE - Adaptive variable selection via convex optimizationcited by 33
  7. 2015Mind the duality gap: safer rules for the Lassocited by 31
  8. 2020Fast OSCAR and OWL Regression via Safe Screening Rulescited by 25
  9. 2016Simultaneous Safe Screening of Features and Samples in Doubly Sparse Modelingcited by 17
  10. 2015GAP Safe screening rules for sparse multi-task and multi-class modelscited by 16
  11. 2014Screening Tests for Lasso Problemscited by 15
  12. 2022An Accelerated Doubly Stochastic Gradient Method with Faster Explicit Model Identificationcited by 14
5 more
  1. 2016Group SLOPE - adaptive selection of groups of predictorscited by 13
  2. 2019Screening Rules for Lasso with Non-Convex Sparse Regularizerscited by 11
  3. 2016GAP Safe Screening Rules for Sparse-Group-Lassocited by 10
  4. 2015Safe Screening for Multi-Task Feature Learning with Multiple Data Matricescited by 4
  5. 2014Group-sparse Matrix Recoverycited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.