Noiser: Bounded Input Perturbations for Attributing Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Feature attribution (FA) methods are common post-hoc approaches that explain how Large Language Models (LLMs) make predictions. Accordingly, generating faithful attributions that reflect the actual inner behavior of the model is crucial. In this paper, we introduce Noiser, a perturbation-based FA method that imposes bounded noise on each input embedding and measures the robustness of the model against partially noised input to obtain the input attributions. Additionally, we propose an answerability metric that employs an instructed judge model to assess the extent to which highly scored tokens suffice to recover the predicted output. Through a comprehensive evaluation across six LLMs and three tasks, we demonstrate that Noiser consistently outperforms existing gradient-based, attention-based, and perturbation-based FA methods in terms of both faithfulness and answerability, making it a robust and effective approach for explaining language model predictions.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Apr 2025.
Builds on
45 of 57 references.
References · 45
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,344
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
- 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416
- 2023WizardLM: Empowering large pre-trained language models to follow complex instructionscited by 1,125
- 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,100
33 more
- 2023SelfCheckGPT: Zero-Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language Modelscited by 810
- 2020Quantifying Attention Flow in Transformerscited by 775
- 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 721
- 2023Instruction Tuning with GPT-4cited by 686
- 2019ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Modelscited by 530
- 2018e-SNLI: Natural Language Inference with Natural Language Explanationscited by 468
- 2019Is Attention Interpretable?cited by 389
- 2019Explain Yourself! Leveraging Language Models for Commonsense Reasoningcited by 367
- 2016Rationalizing Neural Predictionscited by 281
- 2020A Diagnostic Study of Explainability Techniques for Text Classificationcited by 159
- 2023Self-Alignment with Instruction Backtranslationcited by 151
- 2024InFoBench: Evaluating Instruction Following Ability in Large Language Modelscited by 135
- 2019Interpretable Neural Predictions with Differentiable Binary Variablescited by 126
- 2020Learning to Faithfully Rationalize by Constructioncited by 113
- 2021The Out-of-Distribution Problem in Explainability and Search Methods for Feature Importance Explanationscited by 87
- 2024Long Is More for Alignment: A Simple but Tough-to-Beat Baseline for Instruction Fine-Tuningcited by 85
- 2020Aligning Faithful Interpretations with their Social Attributioncited by 79
- 2023Inseq: An Interpretability Toolkit for Sequence Generation Modelscited by 78
- 2016"What is Relevant in a Text Document?": An Interpretable Machine Learning Approachcited by 53
- 2023Sequential Integrated Gradients: a simple but effective method for explaining language modelscited by 52
- 2014Extraction of Salient Sentences from Labelled Documentscited by 50
- 2021Robust Explainability: A Tutorial on Gradient-Based Attribution Methods for Deep Neural Networkscited by 48
- 2022A Comparative Study of Faithfulness Metrics for Model Interpretability Methodscited by 39
- 2021UNIREX: A Unified Learning Framework for Language Model Rationale Extractioncited by 32
- 2021Evaluating the Faithfulness of Importance Measures in NLP by Recursively Masking Allegedly Important Tokens and Retrainingcited by 31
- 2021Rationales for Sequential Predictionscited by 26
- 2022An Empirical Study on Explanations in Out-of-Domain Settingscited by 21
- 2021Enjoy the Salience: Towards Better Transformer-based Faithful Explanations with Word Saliencecited by 16
- 2023Incorporating Attribution Importance for Improving Faithfulness Metricscited by 14
- 2022Saliency Map Verbalization: Comparing Feature Importance Representations from Model-free and Instruction-based Methodscited by 13
- 2024ReAGent: A Model-agnostic Feature Attribution Method for Generative Language Modelscited by 12
- 2023REFER: An End-to-end Rationale Extraction Framework for Explanation Regularizationcited by 4
- 2021Attention vs non-attention for a Shapley-based explanation methodcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2025Interpretation Meets Safety: A Survey on Interpretation Methods and Tools for Improving LLM Safetycited by 10
- 2025DePass: Unified Feature Attributing by Simple Decomposed Forward Passcited by 1
- 2026TRUE: A Trustworthy Unified Explanation Framework for Large Language Model Reasoningcited by 0
- 2026Enhancing Assessment of Self-Consistency in LLM Explanations using Perturbation Strengthcited by 0
- 2026Enhancing Assessment of Self-Consistency in LLM Explanations using Perturbation Strength25 Sep 2026
- 2026TRUE: A Trustworthy Unified Explanation Framework for Large Language Model Reasoning21 Feb 2026
- 2025DePass: Unified Feature Attributing by Simple Decomposed Forward Pass21 Oct 2025
- 2025Interpretation Meets Safety: A Survey on Interpretation Methods and Tools for Improving LLM Safety5 Jun 2025