mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Plot Thickens: Quantitative Part-by-Part Exploration of MLLM Visualization Literacy

arXiv 2504.02217 ↗First posted 3 Apr 2025cs.HCcited by 2

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Chart understanding and anomaly detection

Abstract (arXiv)

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) can interpret data visualizations, but what makes a visualization understandable to these models? Do factors like color, shape, and text influence legibility, and how does this compare to human perception? In this paper, we build on prior work to systematically assess which visualization characteristics impact MLLM interpretability. We expanded the Visualization Literacy Assessment Test (VLAT) test set from 12 to 380 visualizations by varying plot types, colors, and titles. This allowed us to statistically analyze how these features affect model performance. Our findings suggest that while color palettes have no significant impact on accuracy, plot types and the type of title significantly affect MLLM performance. We observe similar trends for model omissions. Based on these insights, we look into which plot types are beneficial for MLLMs in different tasks and propose visualization design principles that enhance MLLM readability. Additionally, we make the extended VLAT test set, VLAT ex, publicly available on https://osf.io/ermwx/ together with our supplemental material for future model testing and evaluation.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Chart understanding and anomaly detection, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. First posted on arXiv 3 Apr 2025.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Visualization Literacy of Multimodal Large Language Models: A Comparative Study
  2. 2025Benchmarking Visual Language Models on Standardized Visualization Literacy Tests
  3. 2026Do MLLMs See What We See? Analyzing Visualization Literacy Barriers in AI Systems
  4. 2026Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models for Scientific Visualization Literacy
  5. 2025Evaluating Graphical Perception with Multimodal LLMs
  6. 2025Do Vision-Language Models See Visualizations Like Humans? Alignment in Chart Categorization
  7. 2025Charts-of-Thought: Enhancing LLM Visualization Literacy Through Structured Data Extraction
  8. 2026Chart-Supported or Model-Supplied? Examining MLLM-Generated Claims for Accessible Visualization