mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Increasing happiness through conversations with artificial intelligence

arXiv 2504.02091 ↗First posted 2 Apr 2025cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Chatbots powered by artificial intelligence (AI) have rapidly become a significant part of everyday life, with over a quarter of American adults using them multiple times per week. While these tools offer potential benefits and risks, a fundamental question remains largely unexplored: How do conversations with AI influence subjective well-being? To investigate this, we conducted a study where participants either engaged in conversations with an AI chatbot (N = 334) or wrote journal entires (N = 193) on the same randomly assigned topics and reported their momentary happiness afterward. We found that happiness after AI chatbot conversations was higher than after journaling, particularly when discussing negative topics such as depression or guilt. Leveraging large language models for sentiment analysis, we found that the AI chatbot mirrored participants' sentiment while maintaining a consistent positivity bias. When discussing negative topics, participants gradually aligned their sentiment with the AI's positivity, leading to an overall increase in happiness. We hypothesized that the history of participants' sentiment prediction errors, the difference between expected and actual emotional tone when responding to the AI chatbot, might explain this happiness effect. Using computational modeling, we find the history of these sentiment prediction errors over the course of a conversation predicts greater post-conversation happiness, demonstrating a central role of emotional expectations during dialogue. Our findings underscore the effect that AI interactions can have on human well-being.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2025.

Builds on

15 of 66 references.

References · 15

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  3. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  4. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
  5. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,150
  6. 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,255
  7. 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Modelscited by 966
  8. 2022A Holistic Approach to Undesired Content Detection in the Real Worldcited by 356
  9. 2024The Ethics of Advanced AI Assistantscited by 107
  10. 2023AI model GPT-3 (dis)informs us better than humanscited by 78
  11. 2025Why human-AI relationships need socioaffective alignmentcited by 47
  12. 2020Learning Rewards from Linguistic Feedbackcited by 41
3 more
  1. 2023LLM-empowered Chatbots for Psychiatrist and Patient Simulation: Application and Evaluationcited by 34
  2. 2024A Linguistic Comparison between Human and ChatGPT-Generated Conversationscited by 9
  3. 2024LLM-Powered Socially Assistive Robot-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Exercises: an Exploratory Study with University Studentscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.