Trapped by Expectations: Functional Fixedness in LLM-Enabled Chat Search
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Functional fixedness, a cognitive bias that restricts users' interactions with a new system or tool to expected or familiar ways, limits the full potential of Large Language Model (LLM)-enabled chat search, especially in complex and exploratory tasks. To investigate its impact, we conducted a crowdsourcing study with 450 participants, each completing one of six decision-making tasks spanning public safety, diet and health management, sustainability, and AI ethics. Participants engaged in a multi-prompt conversation with ChatGPT to address the task, allowing us to compare pre-chat intent-based expectations with observed interactions. We found that: 1) Several aspects of pre-chat expectations are closely associated with users' prior experiences with ChatGPT, search engines, and virtual assistants; 2) Prior system experience shapes language use and prompting behavior. Frequent ChatGPT users reduced deictic terms and hedge words and frequently adjusted prompts. Users with rich search experience maintained structured, less-conversational queries with minimal modifications. Users of virtual assistants favored directive, command-like prompts, reinforcing functional fixedness; 3) When the system failed to meet expectations, participants generated more detailed prompts with increased linguistic diversity, reflecting adaptive shifts. These findings suggest that while preconceived expectations constrain early interactions, unmet expectations can motivate behavioral adaptation. With appropriate system support, this may promote broader exploration of LLM capabilities. This work also introduces a typology for user intents in chat search and highlights the importance of mitigating functional fixedness to support more creative and analytical use of LLMs.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 107 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2025.
Builds on
16 of 107 references.
References · 16
- 2023Large Language Models for Information Retrieval: A Surveycited by 331
- 2023Evaluating Large Language Models in Theory of Mind Taskscited by 222
- 2023Large language models in healthcare and medical domain: A reviewcited by 127
- 2024Cognitive Bias in Decision-Making with LLMscited by 106
- 2020Deciding Fast and Slow: The Role of Cognitive Biases in AI-assisted Decision-makingcited by 59
- 2018Analyzing and Characterizing User Intent in Information-seeking Conversationscited by 36
- 2024AI Can Be Cognitively Biased: An Exploratory Study on Threshold Priming in LLM-Based Batch Relevance Assessmentcited by 20
- 2024User Intent Recognition and Satisfaction with Large Language Models: A User Study with ChatGPTcited by 19
- 2024Task Supportive and Personalized Human-Large Language Model Interaction: A User Studycited by 17
- 2024Exploring a Behavioral Model of "Positive Friction" in Human-AI Interactioncited by 9
- 2020Studying the Effects of Cognitive Biases in Evaluation of Conversational Agentscited by 8
- 2024Cognitively Biased Users Interacting with Algorithmically Biased Results in Whole-Session Search on Debated Topicscited by 6
4 more
- 2024Decoy Effect In Search Interaction: Understanding User Behavior and Measuring System Vulnerabilitycited by 6
- 2024Towards Detecting and Mitigating Cognitive Bias in Spoken Conversational Searchcited by 5
- 2024Can Users Detect Biases or Factual Errors in Generated Responses in Conversational Information-Seeking?cited by 5
- 2024The Decoy Dilemma in Online Medical Information Evaluation: A Comparative Study of Credibility Assessments by LLM and Human Judgescited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.
- 2026"If You're Very Clever, No One Knows You've Used It": The Social Dynamics of Developing Generative AI Literacy in the Workplacecited by 2
- 2026Understanding Usage and Engagement in AI-Powered Scientific Research Tools: The Asta Interaction Datasetcited by 2
- 2025Not All Transparency Is Equal: Source Presentation Effects on Attention, Interaction, and Persuasion in Conversational Searchcited by 1
- 2026Understanding Usage and Engagement in AI-Powered Scientific Research Tools: The Asta Interaction Dataset26 Feb 2026
- 2026"If You're Very Clever, No One Knows You've Used It": The Social Dynamics of Developing Generative AI Literacy in the Workplace1 Feb 2026
- 2025Not All Transparency Is Equal: Source Presentation Effects on Attention, Interaction, and Persuasion in Conversational Search13 Dec 2025