mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Benchmarking Synthetic Tabular Data: A Multi-Dimensional Evaluation Framework

arXiv 2504.01908 ↗First posted 2 Apr 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Evaluating the quality of synthetic data remains a key challenge for ensuring privacy and utility in data-driven research. In this work, we present an evaluation framework that quantifies how well synthetic data replicates original distributional properties while ensuring privacy. The proposed approach employs a holdout-based benchmarking strategy that facilitates quantitative assessment through low- and high-dimensional distribution comparisons, embedding-based similarity measures, and nearest-neighbor distance metrics. The framework supports various data types and structures, including sequential and contextual information, and enables interpretable quality diagnostics through a set of standardized metrics. These contributions aim to support reproducibility and methodological consistency in benchmarking of synthetic data generation techniques. The code of the framework is available at https://github.com/mostly-ai/mostlyai-qa.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2025.

Builds on

4 of 14 references.

References · 4

  1. 2021How Faithful is your Synthetic Data? Sample-level Metrics for Evaluating and Auditing Generative Modelscited by 196
  2. 2022TabSynDex: A Universal Metric for Robust Evaluation of Synthetic Tabular Datacited by 27
  3. 2017Synthetic Data for Social Goodcited by 15
  4. 2024Benchmarking the Fidelity and Utility of Synthetic Relational Datacited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 4.

6 papers.