mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Compositional-ARC: Assessing Systematic Generalization in Abstract Spatial Reasoning

arXiv 2504.01445 ↗First posted 2 Apr 2025cs.AIcited by 3

On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Systematic generalization refers to the capacity to understand and generate novel combinations from known components. Despite recent progress by large language models (LLMs) across various domains, these models often fail to extend their knowledge to novel compositional scenarios, revealing notable limitations in systematic generalization. There has been an ongoing debate about whether neural networks possess the capacity for systematic generalization, with recent studies suggesting that meta-learning approaches designed for compositionality can significantly enhance this ability. However, these insights have largely been confined to linguistic problems, leaving their applicability to other tasks an open question. In this study, we extend meta-learning for compositionality to the domain of abstract spatial reasoning. To this end, we introduce textitCompositional-ARCunicodex2014a dataset designed to evaluate the capacity of models to systematically generalize from known geometric transformations (e.g., translation, rotation) of abstract two-dimensional objects to novel combinations of these transformations (e.g., translation+rotation). Our results show that a small transformer-based encoder-decoder model, trained via meta-learning for compositionality, can systematically generalize to previously unseen transformation compositions. Notably, despite having only 5.7M parameters, this model significantly outperforms state-of-the-art LLMsunicodex2014including o3-mini, GPT-4o, and Gemini 2.0 Flash, which fail to exhibit similar systematic behaviorunicodex2014and performs on par with the winning model of the ARC prize 2024, an 8B-parameter LLM trained via test-time training. Our findings highlight the effectiveness of meta-learning in promoting systematicity beyond linguistic tasks, suggesting a promising direction toward more robust and generalizable models.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 12 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2025.

Builds on

12 of 73 references.

References · 12

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  3. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  4. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  5. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,431
  6. 2024OpenAI o1 System Cardcited by 1,220
  7. 2023Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Modelscited by 810
  8. 2016RL2: Fast Reinforcement Learning via Slow Reinforcement Learningcited by 490
  9. 2019On the Measure of Intelligencecited by 129
  10. 2024Addressing the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus via Procedural Example Generationcited by 31
  11. 2025AlignVLM: Bridging Vision and Language Latent Spaces for Multimodal Document Understandingcited by 7
  12. 2024Towards Compositionally Generalizable Semantic Parsing in Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025DecompSR: A dataset for decomposed analyses of compositional multihop spatial reasoning
  2. 2026Compositional Neuro-Symbolic Reasoning
  3. 2025From Templates to Natural Language: Generalization Challenges in Instruction-Tuned LLMs for Spatial Reasoning
  4. 2026From Symbolic to Geometric: Enabling Spatial Reasoning in Large Language Models
  5. 2026EgoMind: Activating Spatial Cognition through Linguistic Reasoning in MLLMs
  6. 2026Loop, Think, & Generalize: Implicit Reasoning in Recurrent-Depth Transformers
  7. 2023Dynamic MOdularized Reasoning for Compositional Structured Explanation Generation
  8. 2026Transformer See, Transformer Do: Copying as an Intermediate Step in Learning Analogical Reasoning