mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Spectral Normalization and Voigt-Reuss net: A universal approach to microstructure-property forecasting with physical guarantees

arXiv 2504.00712 ↗First posted 1 Apr 2025cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Heterogeneous materials are crucial to producing lightweight components, functional components, and structures composed of them. A crucial step in the design process is the rapid evaluation of their effective mechanical, thermal, or, in general, constitutive properties. The established procedure is to use forward models that accept microstructure geometry and local constitutive properties as inputs. The classical simulation-based approach, which uses, e.g., finite elements and FFT-based solvers, can require substantial computational resources. At the same time, simulation-based models struggle to provide gradients with respect to the microstructure and the constitutive parameters. Such gradients are, however, of paramount importance for microstructure design and for inverting the microstructure-property mapping. Machine learning surrogates can excel in these situations. However, they can lead to unphysical predictions that violate essential bounds on the constitutive response, such as the upper (Voigt-like) or the lower (Reuss-like) bound in linear elasticity. Therefore, we propose a novel spectral normalization scheme that a priori enforces these bounds. The approach is fully agnostic with respect to the chosen microstructural features and the utilized surrogate model. All of these will automatically and strictly predict outputs that obey the upper and lower bounds by construction. The technique can be used for any constitutive tensor that is symmetric and where upper and lower bounds (in the L"owner sense) exist, i.e., for permeability, thermal conductivity, linear elasticity, and many more. We demonstrate the use of spectral normalization in the Voigt-Reuss net using a simple neural network. Numerical examples on truly extensive datasets illustrate the improved accuracy, robustness, and independence of the type of input features in comparison to much-used neural networks.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2025.

Builds on

12 of 46 references.

References · 12

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2015Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a surveycited by 855
  3. 2022Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's nextcited by 608
  4. 2016Input Convex Neural Networkscited by 414
  5. 2018When Gaussian Process Meets Big Data: A Review of Scalable GPscited by 206
  6. 2016A Riemannian Network for SPD Matrix Learningcited by 162
  7. 2023Neural networks meet hyperelasticity: A guide to enforcing physicscited by 46
  8. 2018A deep material network for multiscale topology learning and accelerated nonlinear modeling of heterogeneous materialscited by 31
  9. 2020A numerical method for computing the overall response of nonlinear composites with complex microstructurecited by 18
  10. 2023Neural network-based multiscale modeling of finite strain magneto-elasticity with relaxed convexity criteriacited by 14
  11. 2025Neural networks meet hyperelasticity: A monotonic approachcited by 8
  12. 2019Data-Driven Microstructure Property Relationscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.