Collaborative LLM Numerical Reasoning with Local Data Protection
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Numerical reasoning over documents, which demands both contextual understanding and logical inference, is challenging for low-capacity local models deployed on computation-constrained devices. Although such complex reasoning queries could be routed to powerful remote models like GPT-4, exposing local data raises significant data leakage concerns. Existing mitigation methods generate problem descriptions or examples for remote assistance. However, the inherent complexity of numerical reasoning hinders the local model from generating logically equivalent queries and accurately inferring answers with remote guidance. In this paper, we present a model collaboration framework with two key innovations: (1) a context-aware synthesis strategy that shifts the query topics while preserving reasoning patterns; and (2) a tool-based answer reconstruction approach that reuses the remote-generated plug-and-play solution with code snippets. Experimental results demonstrate that our method achieves better reasoning accuracy than solely using local models while providing stronger data protection than fully relying on remote models. Furthermore, our method improves accuracy by 16.2% - 43.6% while reducing data leakage by 2.3% - 44.6% compared to existing data protection approaches.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 12 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2025.
Builds on
12 of 31 references.
References · 12
- 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,724
- 2022Program of Thoughts Prompting: Disentangling Computation from Reasoning for Numerical Reasoning Taskscited by 1,076
- 2025Agentic Reasoning: A Streamlined Framework for Enhancing LLM Reasoning with Agentic Toolscited by 106
- 2021Differential Privacy for Text Analytics via Natural Text Sanitizationcited by 77
- 2023Harnessing large-language models to generate private synthetic textcited by 65
- 2024PAPILLON: Privacy Preservation from Internet-based and Local Language Model Ensemblescited by 57
- 2023Hide and Seek (HaS): A Lightweight Framework for Prompt Privacy Protectioncited by 38
- 2024CoGenesis: A Framework Collaborating Large and Small Language Models for Secure Context-Aware Instruction Followingcited by 33
- 2024Pandora's White-Box: Precise Training Data Detection and Extraction in Large Language Modelscited by 11
- 2024Can LLMs get help from other LLMs without revealing private information?cited by 9
- 2025Agent Trading Arena: A Study on Numerical Understanding in LLM-Based Agentscited by 9
- 2023InferDPT: Privacy-Preserving Inference for Closed-box Large Language Modelcited by 8
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026More Accurate or More Efficient? Evaluating Locally Deployed Compact Open-Weight Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning
- 2024Improving LLM Reasoning through Scaling Inference Computation with Collaborative Verification
- 2025Minions: Cost-efficient Collaboration Between On-device and Cloud Language Models
- 2025LockForge: Automating Paper-to-Code for Logic Locking with Multi-Agent Reasoning LLMs
- 2026ReCast: Contract-Preserving Protection for Fixed-Interface Multimodal Reasoning
- 2025Think Right, Not More: Test-Time Scaling for Numerical Claim Verification
- 2023Competition-Level Problems are Effective LLM Evaluators
- 2026Learning to Ask: Information Acquisition for SLM-LLM Collaboration, under a budget