Backdoor Detection through Replicated Execution of Outsourced Training
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
It is common practice to outsource the training of machine learning models to cloud providers. Clients who do so gain from the cloud's economies of scale, but implicitly assume trust: the server should not deviate from the client's training procedure. A malicious server may, for instance, seek to insert backdoors in the model. Detecting a backdoored model without prior knowledge of both the backdoor attack and its accompanying trigger remains a challenging problem. In this paper, we show that a client with access to multiple cloud providers can replicate a subset of training steps across multiple servers to detect deviation from the training procedure in a similar manner to differential testing. Assuming some cloud-provided servers are benign, we identify malicious servers by the substantial difference between model updates required for backdooring and those resulting from clean training. Perhaps the strongest advantage of our approach is its suitability to clients that have limited-to-no local compute capability to perform training; we leverage the existence of multiple cloud providers to identify malicious updates without expensive human labeling or heavy computation. We demonstrate the capabilities of our approach on an outsourced supervised learning task where 50% of the cloud providers insert their own backdoor; our approach is able to correctly identify 99.6% of them. In essence, our approach is successful because it replaces the signature-based paradigm taken by existing approaches with an anomaly-based detection paradigm. Furthermore, our approach is robust to several attacks from adaptive adversaries utilizing knowledge of our detection scheme.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Mar 2025.
Builds on
37 of 60 references.
References · 37
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,330
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
- 2017BadNets: Identifying Vulnerabilities in the Machine Learning Model Supply Chaincited by 1,106
- 2017Targeted Backdoor Attacks on Deep Learning Systems Using Data Poisoningcited by 1,055
- 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 765
- 2018Fine-Pruning: Defending Against Backdooring Attacks on Deep Neural Networkscited by 580
- 2018Poison Frogs! Targeted Clean-Label Poisoning Attacks on Neural Networkscited by 519
25 more
- 2018Spectral Signatures in Backdoor Attackscited by 484
- 2022Git Re-Basin: Merging Models modulo Permutation Symmetriescited by 471
- 2018Detecting Backdoor Attacks on Deep Neural Networks by Activation Clusteringcited by 456
- 2020Backdoor Learning: A Surveycited by 426
- 2017DeepXplore: Automated Whitebox Testing of Deep Learning Systemscited by 311
- 2020Attack of the Tails: Yes, You Really Can Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 309
- 2018Manipulating Machine Learning: Poisoning Attacks and Countermeasures for Regression Learningcited by 225
- 2021Hidden Killer: Invisible Textual Backdoor Attacks with Syntactic Triggercited by 222
- 2018Gazelle: A Low Latency Framework for Secure Neural Network Inferencecited by 193
- 2017Neural Trojanscited by 153
- 2022BackdoorBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Backdoor Learningcited by 128
- 2020Backdoor Attacks and Countermeasures on Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Reviewcited by 123
- 2020RAB: Provable Robustness Against Backdoor Attackscited by 118
- 2022Measuring Forgetting of Memorized Training Examplescited by 118
- 2020Intrinsic Certified Robustness of Bagging against Data Poisoning Attackscited by 94
- 2022BppAttack: Stealthy and Efficient Trojan Attacks against Deep Neural Networks via Image Quantization and Contrastive Adversarial Learningcited by 86
- 2021Proof-of-Learning: Definitions and Practicecited by 84
- 2021Manipulating SGD with Data Ordering Attackscited by 74
- 2020Certified Robustness of Nearest Neighbors against Data Poisoning and Backdoor Attackscited by 60
- 2021Randomness In Neural Network Training: Characterizing The Impact of Toolingcited by 59
- 2019NeuronInspect: Detecting Backdoors in Neural Networks via Output Explanationscited by 50
- 2021ModelDiff: Testing-Based DNN Similarity Comparison for Model Reuse Detectioncited by 33
- 2020ConFoc: Content-Focus Protection Against Trojan Attacks on Neural Networkscited by 28
- 2022Architectural Backdoors in Neural Networkscited by 25
- 2022ImpNet: Imperceptible and blackbox-undetectable backdoors in compiled neural networkscited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Your Neighbors Know: Leveraging Local Neighborhoods for Backdoor Detection in Decentralized Learning
- 2022Backdoor Defense in Federated Learning Using Differential Testing and Outlier Detection
- 2024BackdoorIndicator: Leveraging OOD Data for Proactive Backdoor Detection in Federated Learning
- 2024Identify Backdoored Model in Federated Learning via Individual Unlearning
- 2022Identifying Backdoor Attacks in Federated Learning via Anomaly Detection
- 2025BadFU: Backdoor Federated Learning through Adversarial Machine Unlearning
- 2025Runtime Backdoor Detection for Federated Learning via Representational Dissimilarity Analysis
- 2022Towards a Defense Against Federated Backdoor Attacks Under Continuous Training