An Explainable Neural Radiomic Sequence Model with Spatiotemporal Continuity for Quantifying 4DCT-based Pulmonary Ventilation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Accurate evaluation of regional lung ventilation is essential for the management and treatment of lung cancer patients, supporting assessments of pulmonary function, optimization of therapeutic strategies, and monitoring of treatment response. Currently, ventilation scintigraphy using nuclear medicine techniques is widely employed in clinical practice; however, it is often time-consuming, costly, and entails additional radiation exposure. In this study, we propose an explainable neural radiomic sequence model to identify regions of compromised pulmonary ventilation based on four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT). A cohort of 45 lung cancer patients from the VAMPIRE dataset was analyzed. For each patient, lung volumes were segmented from 4DCT, and voxel-wise radiomic features (56-dimensional) were extracted across the respiratory cycle to capture local intensity and texture dynamics, forming temporal radiomic sequences. Ground truth ventilation defects were delineated voxel-wise using Galligas-PET and DTPA-SPECT. To identify compromised regions, we developed a temporal saliency-enhanced explainable long short-term memory (LSTM) network trained on the radiomic sequences. Temporal saliency maps were generated to highlight key features contributing to the model's predictions. The proposed model demonstrated robust performance, achieving average (range) Dice similarity coefficients of 0.78 (0.74-0.79) for 25 PET cases and 0.78 (0.74-0.82) for 20 SPECT cases. The temporal saliency map explained three key radiomic sequences in ventilation quantification: during lung exhalation, compromised pulmonary function region typically exhibits (1) an increasing trend of intensity and (2) a decreasing trend of homogeneity, in contrast to healthy lung tissue.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 134 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Mar 2025.
Builds on
20 of 134 references.
References · 20
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
- 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,109
- 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 973
- 2019UNet++: Redesigning Skip Connections to Exploit Multiscale Features in Image Segmentationcited by 586
- 2019ResUNet-a: a deep learning framework for semantic segmentation of remotely sensed datacited by 261
- 2015A Critical Review of Recurrent Neural Networks for Sequence Learningcited by 224
- 2020U-Net and its variants for medical image segmentation: theory and applicationscited by 169
- 2020Benchmarking Deep Learning Interpretability in Time Series Predictionscited by 102
- 2016Image biomarker standardisation initiativecited by 63
- 2019Visualizing Deep Networks by Optimizing with Integrated Gradientscited by 59
8 more
- 2019Positional Encoding to Control Output Sequence Lengthcited by 56
- 2024Gradient based Feature Attribution in Explainable AI: A Technical Reviewcited by 34
- 2017Feature-based time-series analysiscited by 28
- 2016Multiplicative LSTM for sequence modellingcited by 27
- 2018Sentence-State LSTM for Text Representationcited by 22
- 2018From Hand-Crafted to Deep Learning-based Cancer Radiomics: Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 18
- 2020Statistical power for cluster analysiscited by 8
- 2025Estimating the Optimal Number of Clusters in Categorical Data Clustering by Silhouette Coefficientcited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.