GRASP: Municipal Budget AI Chatbots for Enhancing Civic Engagement
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
There are a growing number of AI applications, but none tailored specifically to help residents answer their questions about municipal budget, a topic most are interested in but few have a solid comprehension of. In this research paper, we propose GRASP, a custom AI chatbot framework which stands for Generation with Retrieval and Action System for Prompts. GRASP provides more truthful and grounded responses to user budget queries than traditional information retrieval systems like general Large Language Models (LLMs) or web searches. These improvements come from the novel combination of a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) framework ("Generation with Retrieval") and an agentic workflow ("Action System"), as well as prompt engineering techniques, the incorporation of municipal budget domain knowledge, and collaboration with local town officials to ensure response truthfulness. During testing, we found that our GRASP chatbot provided precise and accurate responses for local municipal budget queries 78% of the time, while GPT-4o and Gemini were only accurate 60% and 35% of the time, respectively. GRASP chatbots greatly reduce the time and effort needed for the general public to get an intuitive and correct understanding of their town's budget, thus fostering greater communal discourse, improving government transparency, and allowing citizens to make more informed decisions.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Mar 2025.
Builds on
10 of 18 references.
References · 10
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,754
- 2018FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERificationcited by 1,375
- 2024A Survey on RAG Meeting LLMs: Towards Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Modelscited by 452
- 2020Fine-Tuning Pretrained Language Models: Weight Initializations, Data Orders, and Early Stoppingcited by 384
- 2024Dated Data: Tracing Knowledge Cutoffs in Large Language Modelscited by 51
- 2024Evaluating Quality of Answers for Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Strong LLM Is All You Needcited by 7
- 2024Investigating the performance of Retrieval-Augmented Generation and fine-tuning for the development of AI-driven knowledge-based systemscited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025A Knowledge Graph and a Tripartite Evaluation Framework Make Retrieval-Augmented Generation Scalable and Transparent
- 2024FACTS About Building Retrieval Augmented Generation-based Chatbots
- 2026Seeking Information with RAG-Assistants: Does Model Size Matter in Human-AI Collaborations?
- 2024Comparing the Utility, Preference, and Performance of Course Material Search Functionality and Retrieval-Augmented Generation Large Language Model (RAG-LLM) AI Chatbots in Information-Seeking Tasks
- 2025Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Survey on Agentic RAG
- 2025From Textbook to Talkbot: A Case Study of a Greek-Language RAG-Based Chatbot in Higher Education
- 2025A survey: Information search time optimization based on RAG (Retrieval Augmentation Generation) chatbot
- 2026Is Agentic RAG worth it? An experimental comparison of RAG approaches