mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning phases with Quantum Monte Carlo simulation cell

arXiv 2503.23098 ↗First posted 29 Mar 2025cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.dis-nn cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose the use of the ``spin-opstring", derived from Stochastic Series Expansion Quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) simulations as machine learning (ML) input data. It offers a compact, memory-efficient representation of QMC simulation cells, combining the initial state with an operator string that encodes the state's evolution through imaginary time. Using supervised ML, we demonstrate the input's effectiveness in capturing both conventional and topological phase transitions, and in a regression task to predict non-local observables. We also demonstrate the capability of spin-opstring data in transfer learning by training models on one quantum system and successfully predicting on another, as well as showing that models trained on smaller system sizes generalize well to larger ones. Importantly, we illustrate a clear advantage of spin-opstring over conventional spin configurations in the accurate prediction of a quantum phase transition. Finally, we show how the inherent structure of spin-opstring provides an elegant framework for the interpretability of ML predictions. Using two state-of-the-art interpretability techniques, Layer-wise Relevance Propagation and SHapley Additive exPlanations, we show that the ML models learn and rely on physically meaningful features from the input data. Together, these findings establish the spin-opstring as a broadly-applicable and interpretable input format for ML in quantum many-body physics.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Mar 2025.

Builds on

7 of 52 references.

References · 7

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  3. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  4. 2018iNNvestigate neural networks!cited by 58
  5. 2016Discovering Phase Transitions with Unsupervised Learningcited by 49
  6. 2020Machine Learning for Condensed Matter Physicscited by 22
  7. 2016Interpreting the Predictions of Complex ML Models by Layer-wise Relevance Propagationcited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.