Harnessing Mixed Features for Imbalance Data Oversampling: Application to Bank Customers Scoring
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This study investigates rare event detection on tabular data within binary classification. Standard techniques to handle class imbalance include SMOTE, which generates synthetic samples from the minority class. However, SMOTE is intrinsically designed for continuous input variables. In fact, despite SMOTE-NC-its default extension to handle mixed features (continuous and categorical variables)-very few works propose procedures to synthesize mixed features. On the other hand, many real-world classification tasks, such as in banking sector, deal with mixed features, which have a significant impact on predictive performances. To this purpose, we introduce MGS-GRF, an oversampling strategy designed for mixed features. This method uses a kernel density estimator with locally estimated full-rank covariances to generate continuous features, while categorical ones are drawn from the original samples through a generalized random forest. Empirically, contrary to SMOTE-NC, we show that MGS-GRF exhibits two important properties: (i) the coherence i.e. the ability to only generate combinations of categorical features that are already present in the original dataset and (ii) association, i.e. the ability to preserve the dependence between continuous and categorical features. We also evaluate the predictive performances of LightGBM classifiers trained on data sets, augmented with synthetic samples from various strategies. Our comparison is performed on simulated and public real-world data sets, as well as on a private data set from a leading financial institution. We observe that synthetic procedures that have the properties of coherence and association display better predictive performances in terms of various predictive metrics (PR and ROC AUC...), with MGS-GRF being the best one. Furthermore, our method exhibits promising results for the private banking application, with development pipeline being compliant with regulatory constraints.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Mar 2025.
Builds on
5 of 27 references.
References · 5
- 2019Learning Imbalanced Datasets with Label-Distribution-Aware Margin Losscited by 989
- 2016Generalized Random Forestscited by 312
- 2021SMOTE-ENC: A novel SMOTE-based method to generate synthetic data for nominal and continuous featurescited by 12
- 2024SEFraud: Graph-based Self-Explainable Fraud Detection via Interpretative Mask Learningcited by 12
- 2024Do we need rebalancing strategies? A theoretical and empirical study around SMOTE and its variantscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.