Differential equation quantum solvers: engineering measurements to reduce cost
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Quantum computers have been proposed as a solution for efficiently solving non-linear differential equations (DEs), a fundamental task across diverse technological and scientific domains. However, a crucial milestone in this regard is to design protocols that are hardware-aware, making efficient use of limited available quantum resources. We focus here on promising variational methods derived from scientific machine learning: differentiable quantum circuits (DQC), addressing specifically their cost in number of circuit evaluations. Reducing the number of quantum circuit evaluations is particularly valuable in hybrid quantum/classical protocols, where the time required to interface and run quantum hardware at each cycle can impact the total wall-time much more than relatively inexpensive classical post-processing overhead. Here, we propose and test two sample-efficient protocols for solving non-linear DEs, achieving exponential savings in quantum circuit evaluations. These protocols are based on redesigning the extraction of information from DQC in a ``measure-first" approach, by introducing engineered cost operators similar to the randomized-measurement toolbox (i.e. classical shadows). In benchmark simulations on one and two-dimensional DEs, we report up to ~ 100 fold reductions in circuit evaluations. Our protocols thus hold the promise to unlock larger and more challenging non-linear differential equation demonstrations with existing quantum hardware.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Mar 2025.
Builds on
15 of 27 references.
References · 15
- 2020Variational Quantum Algorithmscited by 687
- 2021Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for fluid mechanics: A reviewcited by 470
- 2020The effect of data encoding on the expressive power of variational quantum machine learning modelscited by 328
- 2020Predicting Many Properties of a Quantum System from Very Few Measurementscited by 229
- 2019PPINN: Parareal Physics-Informed Neural Network for time-dependent PDEscited by 116
- 2023Can Physics-Informed Neural Networks beat the Finite Element Method?cited by 68
- 2021Exponential separations between learning with and without quantum memorycited by 50
- 2023On quantum backpropagation, information reuse, and cheating measurement collapsecited by 32
- 2023Shadows of quantum machine learningcited by 31
- 2024On the relation between trainability and dequantization of variational quantum learning modelscited by 24
- 2022Is L2 Physics-Informed Loss Always Suitable for Training Physics-Informed Neural Network?cited by 23
- 2025Learning to Measure Quantum Neural Networkscited by 15
3 more
Built on by
Not cited yet.