mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Differential equation quantum solvers: engineering measurements to reduce cost

arXiv 2503.22656 ↗First posted 28 Mar 2025quant-ph cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Quantum computers have been proposed as a solution for efficiently solving non-linear differential equations (DEs), a fundamental task across diverse technological and scientific domains. However, a crucial milestone in this regard is to design protocols that are hardware-aware, making efficient use of limited available quantum resources. We focus here on promising variational methods derived from scientific machine learning: differentiable quantum circuits (DQC), addressing specifically their cost in number of circuit evaluations. Reducing the number of quantum circuit evaluations is particularly valuable in hybrid quantum/classical protocols, where the time required to interface and run quantum hardware at each cycle can impact the total wall-time much more than relatively inexpensive classical post-processing overhead. Here, we propose and test two sample-efficient protocols for solving non-linear DEs, achieving exponential savings in quantum circuit evaluations. These protocols are based on redesigning the extraction of information from DQC in a ``measure-first" approach, by introducing engineered cost operators similar to the randomized-measurement toolbox (i.e. classical shadows). In benchmark simulations on one and two-dimensional DEs, we report up to ~ 100 fold reductions in circuit evaluations. Our protocols thus hold the promise to unlock larger and more challenging non-linear differential equation demonstrations with existing quantum hardware.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Mar 2025.

Builds on

15 of 27 references.

References · 15

  1. 2020Variational Quantum Algorithmscited by 687
  2. 2021Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for fluid mechanics: A reviewcited by 470
  3. 2020The effect of data encoding on the expressive power of variational quantum machine learning modelscited by 328
  4. 2020Predicting Many Properties of a Quantum System from Very Few Measurementscited by 229
  5. 2019PPINN: Parareal Physics-Informed Neural Network for time-dependent PDEscited by 116
  6. 2023Can Physics-Informed Neural Networks beat the Finite Element Method?cited by 68
  7. 2021Exponential separations between learning with and without quantum memorycited by 50
  8. 2023On quantum backpropagation, information reuse, and cheating measurement collapsecited by 32
  9. 2023Shadows of quantum machine learningcited by 31
  10. 2024On the relation between trainability and dequantization of variational quantum learning modelscited by 24
  11. 2022Is L2 Physics-Informed Loss Always Suitable for Training Physics-Informed Neural Network?cited by 23
  12. 2025Learning to Measure Quantum Neural Networkscited by 15
3 more
  1. 2022Adaptive Online Learning of Quantum Statescited by 12
  2. 2024Predicting Ground State Properties: Constant Sample Complexity and Deep Learning Algorithmscited by 6
  3. 2024Qadence: a differentiable interface for digital-analog programscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.