KEVS: Enhancing Segmentation of Visceral Adipose Tissue in Pre-Cystectomy CT with Gaussian Kernel Density Estimation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Purpose: The distribution of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) in cystectomy patients is indicative of the incidence of post-operative complications. Existing VAT segmentation methods for computed tomography (CT) employing intensity thresholding have limitations relating to inter-observer variability. Moreover, the difficulty in creating ground-truth masks limits the development of deep learning (DL) models for this task. This paper introduces a novel method for VAT prediction in pre-cystectomy CT, which is fully automated and does not require ground-truth VAT masks for training, overcoming aforementioned limitations. Methods: We introduce the Kernel density Enhanced VAT Segmentator ( KEVS), combining a DL semantic segmentation model, for multi-body feature prediction, with Gaussian kernel density estimation analysis of predicted subcutaneous adipose tissue to achieve accurate scan-specific predictions of VAT in the abdominal cavity. Uniquely for a DL pipeline, KEVS does not require ground-truth VAT masks. Results: We verify the ability of KEVS to accurately segment abdominal organs in unseen CT data and compare KEVS VAT segmentation predictions to existing state-of-the-art (SOTA) approaches in a dataset of 20 pre-cystectomy CT scans, collected from University College London Hospital (UCLH-Cyst), with expert ground-truth annotations. KEVS presents a 4.80% and 6.02% improvement in Dice Coefficient over the second best DL and thresholding-based VAT segmentation techniques respectively when evaluated on UCLH-Cyst. Conclusion: This research introduces KEVS; an automated, SOTA method for the prediction of VAT in pre-cystectomy CT which eliminates inter-observer variability and is trained entirely on open-source CT datasets which do not contain ground-truth VAT masks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Mar 2025.
Builds on
8 of 26 references.
References · 8
- 2023Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spacescited by 4,718
- 2022TotalSegmentator: robust segmentation of 104 anatomical structures in CT imagescited by 613
- 2024U-Mamba: Enhancing Long-range Dependency for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 419
- 2022AMOS: A Large-Scale Abdominal Multi-Organ Benchmark for Versatile Medical Image Segmentationcited by 351
- 2020A review of deep learning in medical imaging: Imaging traits, technology trends, case studies with progress highlights, and future promisescited by 231
- 2022Metrics reloaded: Recommendations for image analysis validationcited by 195
- 2024Swin-UMamba: Mamba-based UNet with ImageNet-based pretrainingcited by 179
- 2018On the Effect of Inter-observer Variability for a Reliable Estimation of Uncertainty of Medical Image Segmentationcited by 46
Built on by
Not cited yet.