Comparing Methods for Bias Mitigation in Graph Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper examines the critical role of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) in data preparation for generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) systems, with a particular focus on addressing and mitigating biases. We present a comparative analysis of three distinct methods for bias mitigation: data sparsification, feature modification, and synthetic data augmentation. Through experimental analysis using the german credit dataset, we evaluate these approaches using multiple fairness metrics, including statistical parity, equality of opportunity, and false positive rates. Our research demonstrates that while all methods improve fairness metrics compared to the original dataset, stratified sampling and synthetic data augmentation using GraphSAGE prove particularly effective in balancing demographic representation while maintaining model performance. The results provide practical insights for developing more equitable AI systems while maintaining model performance.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Mar 2025.
Builds on
8 of 24 references.
References · 8
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
- 2023Machine Learning for Synthetic Data Generation: A Reviewcited by 120
- 2021DECAF: Generating Fair Synthetic Data Using Causally-Aware Generative Networkscited by 109
- 2024Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review and Applicationscited by 37
- 2021Graph Neural Network Training with Data Tieringcited by 8
- 2021Quality of Data in Machine Learningcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.