Patients Speak, AI Listens: LLM-based Analysis of Online Reviews Uncovers Key Drivers for Urgent Care Satisfaction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Investigating the public experience of urgent care facilities is essential for promoting community healthcare development. Traditional survey methods often fall short due to limited scope, time, and spatial coverage. Crowdsourcing through online reviews or social media offers a valuable approach to gaining such insights. With recent advancements in large language models (LLMs), extracting nuanced perceptions from reviews has become feasible. This study collects Google Maps reviews across the DMV and Florida areas and conducts prompt engineering with the GPT model to analyze the aspect-based sentiment of urgent care. We first analyze the geospatial patterns of various aspects, including interpersonal factors, operational efficiency, technical quality, finances, and facilities. Next, we determine Census Block Group (CBG)-level characteristics underpinning differences in public perception, including population density, median income, GINI Index, rent-to-income ratio, household below poverty rate, no insurance rate, and unemployment rate. Our results show that interpersonal factors and operational efficiency emerge as the strongest determinants of patient satisfaction in urgent care, while technical quality, finances, and facilities show no significant independent effects when adjusted for in multivariate models. Among socioeconomic and demographic factors, only population density demonstrates a significant but modest association with patient ratings, while the remaining factors exhibit no significant correlations. Overall, this study highlights the potential of crowdsourcing to uncover the key factors that matter to residents and provide valuable insights for stakeholders to improve public satisfaction with urgent care.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Mar 2025.
Builds on
8 of 63 references.
References · 8
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2022GatorTron: A Large Clinical Language Model to Unlock Patient Information from Unstructured Electronic Health Recordscited by 238
- 2022A Survey on Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis: Tasks, Methods, and Challengescited by 61
- 2022Personalized Showcases: Generating Multi-Modal Explanations for Recommendationscited by 30
- 2019Demographic Inference and Representative Population Estimates from Multilingual Social Media Datacited by 24
- 2022Using Twitter Data to Understand Public Perceptions of Approved versus Off-label Use for COVID-19-related Medicationscited by 8
- 2024Leveraging Prompt-Based Large Language Models: Predicting Pandemic Health Decisions and Outcomes Through Social Media Languagecited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.