mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Can Zero-Shot Commercial APIs Deliver Regulatory-Grade Clinical Text DeIdentification?

arXiv 2503.20794 ↗First posted 21 Mar 2025cs.CL cs.CR cs.IRcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We evaluate the performance of four leading solutions for de-identification of unstructured medical text - Azure Health Data Services, AWS Comprehend Medical, OpenAI GPT-4o, and John Snow Labs - on a ground truth dataset of 48 clinical documents annotated by medical experts. The analysis, conducted at both entity-level and token-level, suggests that John Snow Labs' Medical Language Models solution achieves the highest accuracy, with a 96% F1-score in protected health information (PHI) detection, outperforming Azure (91%), AWS (83%), and GPT-4o (79%). John Snow Labs is not only the only solution which achieves regulatory-grade accuracy (surpassing that of human experts) but is also the most cost-effective solution: It is over 80% cheaper compared to Azure and GPT-4o, and is the only solution not priced by token. Its fixed-cost local deployment model avoids the escalating per-request fees of cloud-based services, making it a scalable and economical choice.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Mar 2025.

Builds on

4 of 16 references.

References · 4

  1. 2023DeID-GPT: Zero-shot Medical Text De-Identification by GPT-4cited by 130
  2. 2021Spark NLP: Natural Language Understanding at Scalecited by 16
  3. 2024De-identification is not enough: a comparison between de-identified and synthetic clinical notescited by 14
  4. 2018A Deep Learning Architecture for De-identification of Patient Notes: Implementation and Evaluationcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.