Reliable algorithm selection for machine learning-guided design
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Algorithms for machine learning-guided design, or design algorithms, use machine learning-based predictions to propose novel objects with desired property values. Given a new design task -- for example, to design novel proteins with high binding affinity to a therapeutic target -- one must choose a design algorithm and specify any hyperparameters and predictive and/or generative models involved. How can these decisions be made such that the resulting designs are successful? This paper proposes a method for design algorithm selection, which aims to select design algorithms that will produce a distribution of design labels satisfying a user-specified success criterion -- for example, that at least ten percent of designs' labels exceed a threshold. It does so by combining designs' predicted property values with held-out labeled data to reliably forecast characteristics of the label distributions produced by different design algorithms, building upon techniques from prediction-powered inference. The method is guaranteed with high probability to return design algorithms that yield successful label distributions (or the null set if none exist), if the density ratios between the design and labeled data distributions are known. We demonstrate the method's effectiveness in simulated protein and RNA design tasks, in settings with either known or estimated density ratios.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Mar 2025.
Builds on
22 of 57 references.
References · 22
- 2019Conformal Prediction Under Covariate Shiftcited by 519
- 2018Accurate Uncertainties for Deep Learning Using Calibrated Regressioncited by 422
- 2021Learn then Test: Calibrating Predictive Algorithms to Achieve Risk Controlcited by 271
- 2023Prediction-Powered Inferencecited by 220
- 2020Estimating means of bounded random variables by bettingcited by 169
- 2023Protein Design with Guided Discrete Diffusioncited by 157
- 2019Conditioning by adaptive sampling for robust designcited by 111
- 2020Telescoping Density-Ratio Estimationcited by 108
- 2019Distribution Calibration for Regressioncited by 89
- 2022Selection by Prediction with Conformal p-valuescited by 69
- 2020AdaLead: A simple and robust adaptive greedy search algorithm for sequence designcited by 65
- 2022Conformal Prediction Under Feedback Covariate Shift for Biomolecular Designcited by 54
10 more
- 2019No-Regret Bayesian Optimization with Unknown Hyperparameterscited by 51
- 2018Design by adaptive samplingcited by 32
- 2023Model-free selective inference under covariate shift via weighted conformal p-valuescited by 29
- 2023Estimating the Density Ratio between Distributions with High Discrepancy using Multinomial Logistic Regressioncited by 17
- 2022Improving Screening Processes via Calibrated Subset Selectioncited by 16
- 2024Optimized Conformal Selection: Powerful Selective Inference After Conformity Score Optimizationcited by 14
- 2022Forecasting labels under distribution-shift for machine-guided sequence designcited by 4
- 2023Beyond the training set: an intuitive method for detecting distribution shift in model-based optimizationcited by 4
- 2024Implicitly Guided Design with PropEn: Match your Data to Follow the Gradientcited by 4
- 2023Is novelty predictable?cited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
- 2026Conformal Policy Controlcited by 6
- 2026ConfHit: Conformal Generative Design with Oracle Free Guaranteescited by 1
- 2026ConfHit: Conformal Generative Design with Oracle Free Guarantees7 Mar 2026
- 2026Conformal Policy Control2 Mar 2026