Exact and Linear Convergence for Federated Learning under Arbitrary Client Participation is Attainable
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This work tackles the fundamental challenges in Federated Learning (FL) posed by arbitrary client participation and data heterogeneity, prevalent characteristics in practical FL settings. It is well-established that popular FedAvg-style algorithms struggle with exact convergence and can suffer from slow convergence rates since a decaying learning rate is required to mitigate these scenarios. To address these issues, we introduce the concept of stochastic matrix and the corresponding time-varying graphs as a novel modeling tool to accurately capture the dynamics of arbitrary client participation and the local update procedure. Leveraging this approach, we offer a fresh decentralized perspective on designing FL algorithms and present FOCUS, Federated Optimization with Exact Convergence via Push-pull Strategy, a provably convergent algorithm designed to effectively overcome the previously mentioned two challenges. More specifically, we provide a rigorous proof demonstrating that FOCUS achieves exact convergence with a linear rate regardless of the arbitrary client participation, establishing it as the first work to demonstrate this significant result.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Mar 2025.
Builds on
29 of 43 references.
References · 29
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
- 2019On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Datacited by 1,220
- 2020Tackling the Objective Inconsistency Problem in Heterogeneous Federated Optimizationcited by 897
- 2017Can Decentralized Algorithms Outperform Centralized Algorithms? A Case Study for Decentralized Parallel Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 496
- 2014SAGA: A Fast Incremental Gradient Method With Support for Non-Strongly Convex Composite Objectivescited by 401
- 2020A Unified Theory of Decentralized SGD with Changing Topology and Local Updatescited by 361
- 2014EXTRA: An Exact First-Order Algorithm for Decentralized Consensus Optimizationcited by 160
- 2013On the Convergence of Decentralized Gradient Descentcited by 158
- 2018Stochastic Gradient Push for Distributed Deep Learningcited by 152
- 2016Achieving Geometric Convergence for Distributed Optimization over Time-Varying Graphscited by 149
- 2022Decentralized Federated Learning: Fundamentals, State of the Art, Frameworks, Trends, and Challengescited by 137
17 more
- 2022ProxSkip: Yes! Local Gradient Steps Provably Lead to Communication Acceleration! Finally!cited by 134
- 2023Stochastic Controlled Averaging for Federated Learning with Communication Compressioncited by 100
- 2013Distributed optimization over time-varying directed graphscited by 77
- 2021Fast Federated Learning in the Presence of Arbitrary Device Unavailabilitycited by 72
- 2022FedVARP: Tackling the Variance Due to Partial Client Participation in Federated Learningcited by 62
- 2021Exponential Graph is Provably Efficient for Decentralized Deep Trainingcited by 55
- 2017A decentralized proximal-gradient method with network independent step-sizes and separated convergence ratescited by 51
- 2017Exact Diffusion for Distributed Optimization and Learning --- Part I: Algorithm Developmentcited by 50
- 2024Byzantine-Robust Decentralized Federated Learningcited by 47
- 2018Push-Pull Gradient Methods for Distributed Optimization in Networkscited by 45
- 2022A Unified Analysis of Federated Learning with Arbitrary Client Participationcited by 45
- 2023Improving the Model Consistency of Decentralized Federated Learningcited by 45
- 2017Communication-Efficient Algorithms for Decentralized and Stochastic Optimizationcited by 42
- 2018A linear algorithm for optimization over directed graphs with geometric convergencecited by 25
- 2022DELTA: Diverse Client Sampling for Fasting Federated Learningcited by 24
- 2024Efficient Federated Learning against Heterogeneous and Non-stationary Client Unavailabilitycited by 9
- 2023On graphs with finite-time consensus and their use in gradient trackingcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 5.
6 papers.
- 2025Converge Faster, Talk Less: Hessian-Informed Federated Zeroth-Order Optimizationcited by 3
- 2026Towards Performance-Enhanced Model-Contrastive Federated Learning using Historical Information in Heterogeneous Scenarioscited by 0
- 2026Cooperate to Compete: Strategic Data Generation and Incentivization Framework for Coopetitive Cross-Silo Federated Learningcited by 0
- 2026UB-SMoE: Universally Balanced Sparse Mixture-of-Experts for Resource-adaptive Federated Fine-tuning of Foundation Modelscited by 0
- 2026Federated Foundation Models Fine-Tuning with Heterogeneous Compressed Clientscited by 0
- 2026Over-the-Air Federated Learning in Heterogeneous Mobile Wireless Networkscited by 0
- 2026Over-the-Air Federated Learning in Heterogeneous Mobile Wireless Networks26 Sep 2026
- 2026Federated Foundation Models Fine-Tuning with Heterogeneous Compressed Clients31 Jul 2026
- 2026UB-SMoE: Universally Balanced Sparse Mixture-of-Experts for Resource-adaptive Federated Fine-tuning of Foundation Models15 May 2026
- 2026Cooperate to Compete: Strategic Data Generation and Incentivization Framework for Coopetitive Cross-Silo Federated Learning16 Apr 2026
- 2026Towards Performance-Enhanced Model-Contrastive Federated Learning using Historical Information in Heterogeneous Scenarios12 Feb 2026
- 2025Converge Faster, Talk Less: Hessian-Informed Federated Zeroth-Order Optimization3 Jun 2025