KSHSeek: Data-Driven Approaches to Mitigating and Detecting Knowledge-Shortcut Hallucinations in Generative Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The emergence of large language models (LLMs) has significantly advanced the development of natural language processing (NLP), especially in text generation tasks like question answering. However, model hallucinations remain a major challenge in natural language generation (NLG) tasks due to their complex causes. We systematically expand on the causes of factual hallucinations from the perspective of knowledge shortcuts, analyzing hallucinations arising from correct and defect-free data and demonstrating that knowledge-shortcut hallucinations are prevalent in generative models. To mitigate this issue, we propose a high similarity pruning algorithm at the data preprocessing level to reduce spurious correlations in the data. Additionally, we design a specific detection method for knowledge-shortcut hallucinations to evaluate the effectiveness of our mitigation strategy. Experimental results show that our approach effectively reduces knowledge-shortcut hallucinations, particularly in fine-tuning tasks, without negatively impacting model performance in question answering. This work introduces a new paradigm for mitigating specific hallucination issues in generative models, enhancing their robustness and reliability in real-world applications.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Mar 2025.
Builds on
18 of 26 references.
References · 18
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
- 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,601
- 2023Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver?cited by 488
- 2022Large Language Models Struggle to Learn Long-Tail Knowledgecited by 458
- 2023SemDeDup: Data-efficient learning at web-scale through semantic deduplicationcited by 303
- 2023A Stitch in Time Saves Nine: Detecting and Mitigating Hallucinations of LLMs by Validating Low-Confidence Generationcited by 206
- 2021On Hallucination and Predictive Uncertainty in Conditional Language Generationcited by 176
- 2023SelfCheck: Using LLMs to Zero-Shot Check Their Own Step-by-Step Reasoningcited by 159
- 2021Neural Path Hunter: Reducing Hallucination in Dialogue Systems via Path Groundingcited by 106
6 more
- 2023Large Language Models Can be Lazy Learners: Analyze Shortcuts in In-Context Learningcited by 69
- 2020Mitigating Gender Bias in Captioning Systemscited by 50
- 2022How Pre-trained Language Models Capture Factual Knowledge? A Causal-Inspired Analysiscited by 42
- 2022Finding Dataset Shortcuts with Grammar Inductioncited by 15
- 2023UZH_CLyp at SemEval-2023 Task 9: Head-First Fine-Tuning and ChatGPT Data Generation for Cross-Lingual Learning in Tweet Intimacy Predictioncited by 8
- 2024The Battle of LLMs: A Comparative Study in Conversational QA Taskscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.