Data-centric Federated Graph Learning with Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In federated graph learning (FGL), a complete graph is divided into multiple subgraphs stored in each client due to privacy concerns, and all clients jointly train a global graph model by only transmitting model parameters. A pain point of FGL is the heterogeneity problem, where nodes or structures present non-IID properties among clients (e.g., different node label distributions), dramatically undermining the convergence and performance of FGL. To address this, existing efforts focus on design strategies at the model level, i.e., they design models to extract common knowledge to mitigate heterogeneity. However, these model-level strategies fail to fundamentally address the heterogeneity problem as the model needs to be designed from scratch when transferring to other tasks. Motivated by large language models (LLMs) having achieved remarkable success, we aim to utilize LLMs to fully understand and augment local text-attributed graphs, to address data heterogeneity at the data level. In this paper, we propose a general framework LLM4FGL that innovatively decomposes the task of LLM for FGL into two sub-tasks theoretically. Specifically, for each client, it first utilizes the LLM to generate missing neighbors and then infers connections between generated nodes and raw nodes. To improve the quality of generated nodes, we design a novel federated generation-and-reflection mechanism for LLMs, without the need to modify the parameters of the LLM but relying solely on the collective feedback from all clients. After neighbor generation, all the clients utilize a pre-trained edge predictor to infer the missing edges. Furthermore, our framework can seamlessly integrate as a plug-in with existing FGL methods. Experiments on three real-world datasets demonstrate the superiority of our method compared to advanced baselines.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Mar 2025.
Builds on
18 of 34 references.
References · 18
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,474
- 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,987
- 2021Subgraph Federated Learning with Missing Neighbor Generationcited by 132
- 2021Be Confident! Towards Trustworthy Graph Neural Networks via Confidence Calibrationcited by 92
- 2023Label-free Node Classification on Graphs with Large Language Models (LLMS)cited by 72
- 2023GIMLET: A Unified Graph-Text Model for Instruction-Based Molecule Zero-Shot Learningcited by 70
- 2024UniGraph: Learning a Unified Cross-Domain Foundation Model for Text-Attributed Graphscited by 66
- 2024FedGTA: Topology-aware Averaging for Federated Graph Learningcited by 44
- 2024Can Graph Learning Improve Planning in LLM-based Agents?cited by 43
6 more
- 2023Graph-Aware Language Model Pre-Training on a Large Graph Corpus Can Help Multiple Graph Applicationscited by 33
- 2024Federated Graph Semantic and Structural Learningcited by 30
- 2024AdaFGL: A New Paradigm for Federated Node Classification with Topology Heterogeneitycited by 25
- 2023Leveraging Large Language Models for Node Generation in Few-Shot Learning on Text-Attributed Graphscited by 23
- 2024Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models in Graph Generationcited by 15
- 2024Intruding with Words: Towards Understanding Graph Injection Attacks at the Text Levelcited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.