Threshold Crossings as Tail Events for Catastrophic AI Risk
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We analyse circumstances in which bifurcation-driven jumps in AI systems are associated with emergent heavy-tailed outcome distributions. By analysing how a control parameter's random fluctuations near a catastrophic threshold generate extreme outcomes, we demonstrate in what circumstances the probability of a sudden, large-scale, transition aligns closely with the tail probability of the resulting damage distribution. Our results contribute to research in monitoring, mitigation and control of AI systems when seeking to manage potentially catastrophic AI risk.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Mar 2025.
Builds on
8 of 18 references.
References · 8
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2023An Overview of Catastrophic AI Riskscited by 222
- 2022Revisiting Neural Scaling Laws in Language and Visioncited by 132
- 2025How Do Large Language Monkeys Get Their Power (Laws)?cited by 43
- 2024Introduction to AI Safety, Ethics, and Societycited by 15
- 2025Superintelligence Strategy: Expert Versioncited by 7
- 2025Where AI Assurance Might Go Wrong: Initial lessons from engineering of critical systemscited by 4
- 2025Statistical Scenario Modelling and Lookalike Distributions for Multi-Variate AI Riskcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.