MetaSel: A Test Selection Approach for Fine-tuned DNN Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) face challenges during deployment due to covariate shift, i.e., data distribution shifts between development and deployment contexts. Fine-tuning adapts pre-trained models to new contexts requiring smaller labeled sets. However, testing fine-tuned models under constrained labeling budgets remains a critical challenge. This paper introduces MetaSel, a new approach tailored for DNN models that have been fine-tuned to address covariate shift, to select tests from unlabeled inputs. MetaSel assumes that fine-tuned and pre-trained models share related data distributions and exhibit similar behaviors for many inputs. However, their behaviors diverge within the input subspace where fine-tuning alters decision boundaries, making those inputs more prone to misclassification. Unlike general approaches that rely solely on the DNN model and its input set, MetaSel leverages information from both the fine-tuned and pre-trained models and their behavioral differences to estimate misclassification probability for unlabeled test inputs, enabling more effective test selection. Our extensive empirical evaluation, comparing MetaSel against 11 state-of-the-art approaches and involving 68 fine-tuned models across weak, medium, and strong distribution shifts, demonstrates that MetaSel consistently delivers significant improvements in Test Relative Coverage (TRC) over existing baselines, particularly under highly constrained labeling budgets. MetaSel shows average TRC improvements of 28.46% to 56.18% over the most frequent second-best baselines while maintaining a high TRC median and low variability. Our results confirm MetaSel's practicality, robustness, and cost-effectiveness for test selection in the context of fine-tuned models.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Mar 2025.
Builds on
24 of 52 references.
References · 24
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,328
- 2014Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Imagescited by 776
- 2017DeepXplore: Automated Whitebox Testing of Deep Learning Systemscited by 311
- 2018DeepGauge: Multi-Granularity Testing Criteria for Deep Learning Systemscited by 147
- 2020Likelihood Regret: An Out-of-Distribution Detection Score For Variational Auto-encodercited by 145
- 2019MNIST-C: A Robustness Benchmark for Computer Visioncited by 138
12 more
- 2018Guiding Deep Learning System Testing using Surprise Adequacycited by 124
- 2019Test Selection for Deep Learning Systemscited by 27
- 2022Simple Techniques Work Surprisingly Well for Neural Network Test Prioritization and Active Learning (Replicability Study)cited by 27
- 2021Black-Box Testing of Deep Neural Networks Through Test Case Diversitycited by 18
- 2019Detecting Adversarial Examples and Other Misclassifications in Neural Networks by Introspectioncited by 16
- 2022Revisiting Neuron Coverage Metrics and Quality of Deep Neural Networkscited by 15
- 2023DeepGD: A Multi-Objective Black-Box Test Selection Approach for Deep Neural Networkscited by 11
- 2021A Review and Refinement of Surprise Adequacycited by 9
- 2021TestRank: Bringing Order into Unlabeled Test Instances for Deep Learning Taskscited by 7
- 2021A Uniform Framework for Anomaly Detection in Deep Neural Networkscited by 4
- 2023Evaluating the Robustness of Test Selection Methods for Deep Neural Networkscited by 4
- 2023TEASMA: A Practical Methodology for Test Adequacy Assessment of Deep Neural Networkscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.