Hi-ALPS -- An Experimental Robustness Quantification of Six LiDAR-based Object Detection Systems for Autonomous Driving
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) is an essential sensor technology for autonomous driving as it can capture high-resolution 3D data. As 3D object detection systems (OD) can interpret such point cloud data, they play a key role in the driving decisions of autonomous vehicles. Consequently, such 3D OD must be robust against all types of perturbations and must therefore be extensively tested. One approach is the use of adversarial examples, which are small, sometimes sophisticated perturbations in the input data that change, i.e., falsify, the prediction of the OD. These perturbations are carefully designed based on the weaknesses of the OD. The robustness of the OD cannot be quantified with adversarial examples in general, because if the OD is vulnerable to a given attack, it is unclear whether this is due to the robustness of the OD or whether the attack algorithm produces particularly strong adversarial examples. The contribution of this work is Hi-ALPS -- Hierarchical Adversarial-example-based LiDAR Perturbation Level System, where higher robustness of the OD is required to withstand the perturbations as the perturbation levels increase. In doing so, the Hi-ALPS levels successively implement a heuristic followed by established adversarial example approaches. In a series of comprehensive experiments using Hi-ALPS, we quantify the robustness of six state-of-the-art 3D OD under different types of perturbations. The results of the experiments show that none of the OD is robust against all Hi-ALPS levels; an important factor for the ranking is that human observers can still correctly recognize the perturbed objects, as the respective perturbations are small. To increase the robustness of the OD, we discuss the applicability of state-of-the-art countermeasures. In addition, we derive further suggestions for countermeasures based on our experimental results.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Mar 2025.
Builds on
33 of 40 references.
References · 33
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2016PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentationcited by 5,248
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2017PointNet++: Deep Hierarchical Feature Learning on Point Sets in a Metric Spacecited by 4,401
- 2019Scalability in Perception for Autonomous Driving: Waymo Open Datasetcited by 2,451
- 2018PointPillars: Fast Encoders for Object Detection from Point Cloudscited by 1,715
- 2018PointRCNN: 3D Object Proposal Generation and Detection from Point Cloudcited by 941
- 2019PV-RCNN: Point-Voxel Feature Set Abstraction for 3D Object Detectioncited by 891
- 2019From Points to Parts: 3D Object Detection from Point Cloud with Part-aware and Part-aggregation Networkcited by 368
- 2021PV-RCNN++: Point-Voxel Feature Set Abstraction With Local Vector Representation for 3D Object Detectioncited by 232
- 2019Adversarial Sensor Attack on LiDAR-based Perception in Autonomous Drivingcited by 152
- 2018Generating 3D Adversarial Point Cloudscited by 144
21 more
- 2020Physically Realizable Adversarial Examples for LiDAR Object Detectioncited by 137
- 20223D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 132
- 2023Robo3D: Towards Robust and Reliable 3D Perception against Corruptionscited by 129
- 2023Benchmarking Robustness of 3D Object Detection to Common Corruptions in Autonomous Drivingcited by 114
- 2018PointCloud Saliency Mapscited by 112
- 2021Improving 3D Object Detection with Channel-wise Transformercited by 108
- 2022Voxel Set Transformer: A Set-to-Set Approach to 3D Object Detection from Point Cloudscited by 102
- 2020Towards Robust LiDAR-based Perception in Autonomous Driving: General Black-box Adversarial Sensor Attack and Countermeasurescited by 95
- 2019Extending Adversarial Attacks and Defenses to Deep 3D Point Cloud Classifierscited by 92
- 2022Point Density-Aware Voxels for LiDAR 3D Object Detectioncited by 70
- 2019Robustness of 3D Deep Learning in an Adversarial Settingcited by 55
- 2020LG-GAN: Label Guided Adversarial Network for Flexible Targeted Attack of Point Cloud-based Deep Networkscited by 55
- 2021Exploring Adversarial Robustness of Multi-Sensor Perception Systems in Self Drivingcited by 45
- 2020Minimal Adversarial Examples for Deep Learning on 3D Point Cloudscited by 41
- 2022A Comprehensive Study of the Robustness for LiDAR-based 3D Object Detectors against Adversarial Attackscited by 22
- 2021Robustness Certification for Point Cloud Modelscited by 16
- 2022OccAM's Laser: Occlusion-based Attribution Maps for 3D Object Detectors on LiDAR Datacited by 13
- 2022Common Corruption Robustness of Point Cloud Detectors: Benchmark and Enhancementcited by 9
- 2023LiDAR Spoofing Meets the New-Gen: Capability Improvements, Broken Assumptions, and New Attack Strategiescited by 9
- 2023Adversarial Attacks and Defenses on 3D Point Cloud Classification: A Surveycited by 5
- 2022Survey and Systematization of 3D Object Detection Models and Methodscited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.