To impute or not to impute: How machine learning modelers treat missing data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Missing data is prevalent in tabular machine learning (ML) models, and different missing data treatment methods can significantly affect ML model training results. However, little is known about how ML researchers and engineers choose missing data treatment methods and what factors affect their choices. To this end, we conducted a survey of 70 ML researchers and engineers. Our results revealed that most participants were not making informed decisions regarding missing data treatment, which could significantly affect the validity of the ML models trained by these researchers. We advocate for better education on missing data, more standardized missing data reporting, and better missing data analysis tools.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Mar 2025.
Builds on
4 of 26 references.
References · 4
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
- 2022Classification of datasets with imputed missing values: does imputation quality matter?cited by 21
- 2022The Missing Indicator Method: From Low to High Dimensionscited by 19
- 2024Interpretable Generalized Additive Models for Datasets with Missing Valuescited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.