Advancing Problem-Based Learning in Biomedical Engineering in the Era of Generative AI
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Problem-Based Learning (PBL) has significantly impacted biomedical engineering (BME) education since its introduction in the early 2000s, effectively enhancing critical thinking and real-world knowledge application among students. With biomedical engineering rapidly converging with artificial intelligence (AI), integrating effective AI education into established curricula has become challenging yet increasingly necessary. Recent advancements, including AI's recognition by the 2024 Nobel Prize, have highlighted the importance of training students comprehensively in biomedical AI. However, effective biomedical AI education faces substantial obstacles, such as diverse student backgrounds, limited personalized mentoring, constrained computational resources, and difficulties in safely scaling hands-on practical experiments due to privacy and ethical concerns associated with biomedical data. To overcome these issues, we conducted a three-year (2021-2023) case study implementing an advanced PBL framework tailored specifically for biomedical AI education, involving 92 undergraduate and 156 graduate students from the joint Biomedical Engineering program of Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University. Our approach emphasizes collaborative, interdisciplinary problem-solving through authentic biomedical AI challenges. The implementation led to measurable improvements in learning outcomes, evidenced by high research productivity (16 student-authored publications), consistently positive peer evaluations, and successful development of innovative computational methods addressing real biomedical challenges. Additionally, we examined the role of generative AI both as a teaching subject and an educational support tool within the PBL framework. Our study presents a practical and scalable roadmap for biomedical engineering departments aiming to integrate robust AI education into their curricula.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 103 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Mar 2025.
Builds on
14 of 103 references.
References · 14
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
- 2020What Disease does this Patient Have? A Large-scale Open Domain Question Answering Dataset from Medical Examscited by 1,356
- 2023LLaVA-Med: Training a Large Language-and-Vision Assistant for Biomedicine in One Daycited by 1,305
- 2019PubMedQA: A Dataset for Biomedical Research Question Answeringcited by 1,288
- 2022MedMCQA : A Large-scale Multi-Subject Multi-Choice Dataset for Medical domain Question Answeringcited by 543
- 2020PathVQA: 30000+ Questions for Medical Visual Question Answeringcited by 475
- 2021SLAKE: A Semantically-Labeled Knowledge-Enhanced Dataset for Medical Visual Question Answeringcited by 449
- 2023Tool Learning with Foundation Modelscited by 302
- 2023A Survey of Large Language Models for Healthcare: from Data, Technology, and Applications to Accountability and Ethicscited by 163
- 2023Large language models in healthcare and medical domain: A reviewcited by 127
- 2019HEAD-QA: A Healthcare Dataset for Complex Reasoningcited by 101
Built on by
Not cited yet.