Safety Evaluation and Enhancement of DeepSeek Models in Chinese Contexts
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code
Abstract (arXiv)
DeepSeek-R1, renowned for its exceptional reasoning capabilities and open-source strategy, is significantly influencing the global artificial intelligence landscape. However, it exhibits notable safety shortcomings. Recent research conducted by Robust Intelligence, a subsidiary of Cisco, in collaboration with the University of Pennsylvania, revealed that DeepSeek-R1 achieves a 100% attack success rate when processing harmful prompts. Furthermore, multiple security firms and research institutions have identified critical security vulnerabilities within the model. Although China Unicom has uncovered safety vulnerabilities of R1 in Chinese contexts, the safety capabilities of the remaining distilled models in the R1 series have not yet been comprehensively evaluated. To address this gap, this study utilizes the comprehensive Chinese safety benchmark CHiSafetyBench to conduct an in-depth safety evaluation of the DeepSeek-R1 series distilled models. The objective is to assess the safety capabilities of these models in Chinese contexts both before and after distillation, and to further elucidate the adverse effects of distillation on model safety. Building on these findings, we implement targeted safety enhancements for the entire DeepSeek-R1 model series. Evaluation results indicate that the enhanced models achieve significant improvements in safety while maintaining reasoning capabilities without notable degradation. We open-source the safety-enhanced models at https://github.com/UnicomAI/DeepSeek-R1-Safe to serve as a valuable resource for future research and optimization of DeepSeek models.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 10 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Mar 2025.
Builds on
10 of 13 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Safety Evaluation of DeepSeek Models in Chinese Contexts16 Feb
- 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code12 Mar
Other references · 8
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
- 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,429
- 2023Large Language Models for Generative Information Extraction: A Surveycited by 185
- 2025Advancing Reasoning in Large Language Models: Promising Methods and Approachescited by 43
- 2024CHiSafetyBench: A Chinese Hierarchical Safety Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2025A Comprehensive Survey on Trustworthiness in Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 25
- 2026Towards a Mechanistic Understanding of Large Reasoning Models: A Survey of Training, Inference, and Failurescited by 6
- 2025The Tower of Babel Revisited: Multilingual Jailbreak Prompts on Closed-Source Large Language Modelscited by 3
- 2026Mitigating the Safety-utility Trade-off in LLM Alignment via Adaptive Safe Context Learningcited by 2
- 2026Mitigating the Safety-utility Trade-off in LLM Alignment via Adaptive Safe Context Learning14 Feb 2026
- 2026Towards a Mechanistic Understanding of Large Reasoning Models: A Survey of Training, Inference, and Failures11 Jan 2026
- 2025A Comprehensive Survey on Trustworthiness in Reasoning with Large Language Models4 Sep 2025
- 2025The Tower of Babel Revisited: Multilingual Jailbreak Prompts on Closed-Source Large Language Models18 May 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Towards Understanding the Safety Boundaries of DeepSeek Models: Evaluation and Findings
- 2025RealSafe-R1: Safety-Aligned DeepSeek-R1 without Compromising Reasoning Capability
- 2025The Hidden Risks of Large Reasoning Models: A Safety Assessment of R1
- 2025o3-mini vs DeepSeek-R1: Which One is Safer?
- 2023Safety Assessment of Chinese Large Language Models
- 2025Quantifying the Capability Boundary of DeepSeek Models: An Application-Driven Performance Analysis
- 2025Challenges in Ensuring AI Safety in DeepSeek-R1 Models: The Shortcomings of Reinforcement Learning Strategies
- 2025Brief analysis of DeepSeek R1 and its implications for Generative AI