Variance-Aware Noisy Training: Hardening DNNs against Unstable Analog Computations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The disparity between the computational demands of deep learning and the capabilities of compute hardware is expanding drastically. Although deep learning achieves remarkable performance in countless tasks, its escalating requirements for computational power and energy consumption surpass the sustainable limits of even specialized neural processing units, including the Apple Neural Engine and NVIDIA TensorCores. This challenge is intensified by the slowdown in CMOS scaling. Analog computing presents a promising alternative, offering substantial improvements in energy efficiency by directly manipulating physical quantities such as current, voltage, charge, or photons. However, it is inherently vulnerable to manufacturing variations, nonlinearities, and noise, leading to degraded prediction accuracy. One of the most effective techniques for enhancing robustness, Noisy Training, introduces noise during the training phase to reinforce the model against disturbances encountered during inference. Although highly effective, its performance degrades in real-world environments where noise characteristics fluctuate due to external factors such as temperature variations and temporal drift. This study underscores the necessity of Noisy Training while revealing its fundamental limitations in the presence of dynamic noise. To address these challenges, we propose Variance-Aware Noisy Training, a novel approach that mitigates performance degradation by incorporating noise schedules which emulate the evolving noise conditions encountered during inference. Our method substantially improves model robustness, without training overhead. We demonstrate a significant increase in robustness, from 79.3% with conventional Noisy Training to 97.6% with Variance-Aware Noisy Training on CIFAR-10 and from 32.4% to 99.7% on Tiny ImageNet.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Mar 2025.
Builds on
16 of 44 references.
References · 16
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,404
- 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
- 2019Surrogate Gradient Learning in Spiking Neural Networkscited by 604
- 2017Towards Robust Neural Networks via Random Self-ensemblecited by 158
- 2015Adding Gradient Noise Improves Learning for Very Deep Networkscited by 144
- 2018Parametric Noise Injection: Trainable Randomness to Improve Deep Neural Network Robustness against Adversarial Attackcited by 123
- 2019Defensive Quantization: When Efficiency Meets Robustnesscited by 95
- 2016Noisy Activation Functionscited by 53
- 2015Resiliency of Deep Neural Networks under Quantizationcited by 34
- 2016Acceleration of Deep Neural Network Training with Resistive Cross-Point Devicescited by 28
4 more
- 2020Noisy Machines: Understanding Noisy Neural Networks and Enhancing Robustness to Analog Hardware Errors Using Distillationcited by 17
- 2020Accelerated Analog Neuromorphic Computingcited by 9
- 2021Adversarial Robustness by Design through Analog Computing and Synthetic Gradientscited by 7
- 2022Walking Noise: On Layer-Specific Robustness of Neural Architectures against Noisy Computations and Associated Characteristic Learning Dynamicscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.