mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

No Thing, Nothing: Highlighting Safety-Critical Classes for Robust LiDAR Semantic Segmentation in Adverse Weather

arXiv 2503.15910 ↗First posted 20 Mar 2025cs.CV cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing domain generalization methods for LiDAR semantic segmentation under adverse weather struggle to accurately predict "things" categories compared to "stuff" categories. In typical driving scenes, "things" categories can be dynamic and associated with higher collision risks, making them crucial for safe navigation and planning. Recognizing the importance of "things" categories, we identify their performance drop as a serious bottleneck in existing approaches. We observed that adverse weather induces degradation of semantic-level features and both corruption of local features, leading to a misprediction of "things" as "stuff". To mitigate these corruptions, we suggest our method, NTN - segmeNt Things for No-accident. To address semantic-level feature corruption, we bind each point feature to its superclass, preventing the misprediction of things classes into visually dissimilar categories. Additionally, to enhance robustness against local corruption caused by adverse weather, we define each LiDAR beam as a local region and propose a regularization term that aligns the clean data with its corrupted counterpart in feature space. NTN achieves state-of-the-art performance with a +2.6 mIoU gain on the SemanticKITTI-to-SemanticSTF benchmark and +7.9 mIoU on the SemanticPOSS-to-SemanticSTF benchmark. Notably, NTN achieves a +4.8 and +7.9 mIoU improvement on "things" classes, respectively, highlighting its effectiveness.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Mar 2025.

Builds on

23 of 32 references.

References · 23

  1. 2016PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentationcited by 5,248
  2. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
  3. 2020Point Transformercited by 1,470
  4. 2021MLP-Mixer: An all-MLP Architecture for Visioncited by 1,446
  5. 20194D Spatio-Temporal ConvNets: Minkowski Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 1,208
  6. 2019KPConv: Flexible and Deformable Convolution for Point Cloudscited by 1,205
  7. 2020Searching Efficient 3D Architectures with Sparse Point-Voxel Convolutioncited by 423
  8. 2023Robo3D: Towards Robust and Reliable 3D Perception against Corruptionscited by 129
  9. 2023Rethinking Range View Representation for LiDAR Segmentationcited by 128
  10. 2023Spherical Transformer for LiDAR-based 3D Recognitioncited by 125
  11. 2020SemanticPOSS: A Point Cloud Dataset with Large Quantity of Dynamic Instancescited by 123
  12. 2020Cylinder3D: An Effective 3D Framework for Driving-scene LiDAR Semantic Segmentationcited by 112
11 more
  1. 2021Fog Simulation on Real LiDAR Point Clouds for 3D Object Detection in Adverse Weathercited by 97
  2. 2021Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentation by Pixel-to-Prototype Contrastcited by 85
  3. 2023RangeViT: Towards Vision Transformers for 3D Semantic Segmentation in Autonomous Drivingcited by 76
  4. 2022PolarMix: A General Data Augmentation Technique for LiDAR Point Cloudscited by 74
  5. 2022LiDAR Snowfall Simulation for Robust 3D Object Detectioncited by 73
  6. 2021PointMixer: MLP-Mixer for Point Cloud Understandingcited by 71
  7. 20233D Semantic Segmentation in the Wild: Learning Generalized Models for Adverse-Condition Point Cloudscited by 46
  8. 2022Unbiased Subclass Regularization for Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 33
  9. 2024UniMix: Towards Domain Adaptive and Generalizable LiDAR Semantic Segmentation in Adverse Weathercited by 24
  10. 2024KPConvX: Modernizing Kernel Point Convolution with Kernel Attentioncited by 16
  11. 2024Rethinking Data Augmentation for Robust LiDAR Semantic Segmentation in Adverse Weathercited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

5 papers.