Real-world validation of a multimodal LLM-powered pipeline for High-Accuracy Clinical Trial Patient Matching leveraging EHR data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Background: Patient recruitment in clinical trials is hindered by complex eligibility criteria and labor-intensive chart reviews. Prior research using text-only models have struggled to address this problem in a reliable and scalable way due to (1) limited reasoning capabilities, (2) information loss from converting visual records to text, and (3) lack of a generic EHR integration to extract patient data. Methods: We introduce a broadly applicable, integration-free, LLM-powered pipeline that automates patient-trial matching using unprocessed documents extracted from EHRs. Our approach leverages (1) the new reasoning-LLM paradigm, enabling the assessment of even the most complex criteria, (2) visual capabilities of latest LLMs to interpret medical records without lossy image-to-text conversions, and (3) multimodal embeddings for efficient medical record search. The pipeline was validated on the n2c2 2018 cohort selection dataset (288 diabetic patients) and a real-world dataset composed of 485 patients from 30 different sites matched against 36 diverse trials. Results: On the n2c2 dataset, our method achieved a new state-of-the-art criterion-level accuracy of 93%. In real-world trials, the pipeline yielded an accuracy of 87%, undermined by the difficulty to replicate human decision-making when medical records lack sufficient information. Nevertheless, users were able to review overall eligibility in under 9 minutes per patient on average, representing an 80% improvement over traditional manual chart reviews. Conclusion: This pipeline demonstrates robust performance in clinical trial patient matching without requiring custom integration with site systems or trial-specific tailoring, thereby enabling scalable deployment across sites seeking to leverage AI for patient matching.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Mar 2025.
Builds on
7 of 23 references.
References · 7
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,137
- 2024ColPali: Efficient Document Retrieval with Vision Language Modelscited by 195
- 2023Matching Patients to Clinical Trials with Large Language Modelscited by 69
- 2024Zero-Shot Clinical Trial Patient Matching with LLMscited by 35
- 2023Scaling Clinical Trial Matching Using Large Language Models: A Case Study in Oncologycited by 24
- 2023Improving Patient Pre-screening for Clinical Trials: Assisting Physicians with Large Language Modelscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025LLM-Match: An Open-Sourced Patient Matching Model Based on Large Language Models and Retrieval-Augmented Generation
- 2025A Survey on LLM-Assisted Clinical Trial Recruitment
- 2026Lightweight Retrieval-Augmented Generation and Large Language Model-Based Modeling for Scalable Patient-Trial Matching
- 2026Retrieval-Augmented LLMs for Evidence Localization in Clinical Trial Recruitment from Longitudinal EHR Narratives
- 2023Distilling Large Language Models for Matching Patients to Clinical Trials
- 2025TrialMatchAI: An End-to-End AI-powered Clinical Trial Recommendation System to Streamline Patient-to-Trial Matching
- 2025Toward an AI Reasoning-Enabled System for Patient-Clinical Trial Matching
- 2025VeriFact: Verifying Facts in LLM-Generated Clinical Text with Electronic Health Records