mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SPILL: Domain-Adaptive Intent Clustering based on Selection and Pooling with Large Language Models

arXiv 2503.15351 ↗First posted 19 Mar 2025cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we propose Selection and Pooling with Large Language Models (SPILL), an intuitive and domain-adaptive method for intent clustering without fine-tuning. Existing embeddings-based clustering methods rely on a few labeled examples or unsupervised fine-tuning to optimize results for each new dataset, which makes them less generalizable to multiple datasets. Our goal is to make these existing embedders more generalizable to new domain datasets without further fine-tuning. Inspired by our theoretical derivation and simulation results on the effectiveness of sampling and pooling techniques, we view the clustering task as a small-scale selection problem. A good solution to this problem is associated with better clustering performance. Accordingly, we propose a two-stage approach: First, for each utterance (referred to as the seed), we derive its embedding using an existing embedder. Then, we apply a distance metric to select a pool of candidates close to the seed. Because the embedder is not optimized for new datasets, in the second stage, we use an LLM to further select utterances from these candidates that share the same intent as the seed. Finally, we pool these selected candidates with the seed to derive a refined embedding for the seed. We found that our method generally outperforms directly using an embedder, and it achieves comparable results to other state-of-the-art studies, even those that use much larger models and require fine-tuning, showing its strength and efficiency. Our results indicate that our method enables existing embedders to be further improved without additional fine-tuning, making them more adaptable to new domain datasets. Additionally, viewing the clustering task as a small-scale selection problem gives the potential of using LLMs to customize clustering tasks according to the user's goals.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Mar 2025.

Builds on

20 of 38 references.

References · 20

  1. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  2. 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,998
  3. 2022Text Embeddings by Weakly-Supervised Contrastive Pre-trainingcited by 1,253
  4. 2023Large Language Modelscited by 780
  5. 2019Towards Scalable Multi-domain Conversational Agents: The Schema-Guided Dialogue Datasetcited by 434
  6. 2020Efficient Intent Detection with Dual Sentence Encoderscited by 433
  7. 2019An Evaluation Dataset for Intent Classification and Out-of-Scope Predictioncited by 386
  8. 2020Keystroke Dynamics as Part of Lifeloggingcited by 334
  9. 2022One Embedder, Any Task: Instruction-Finetuned Text Embeddingscited by 333
  10. 2021Recent Advances in Deep Learning Based Dialogue Systems: A Systematic Surveycited by 130
  11. 2021Supporting Clustering with Contrastive Learningcited by 90
  12. 2023Large Language Models Enable Few-Shot Clusteringcited by 72
8 more
  1. 2023ClusterLLM: Large Language Models as a Guide for Text Clusteringcited by 70
  2. 2020Discovering New Intents with Deep Aligned Clusteringcited by 68
  3. 2024A Survey on Recent Advances in Conversational Data Generationcited by 23
  4. 2023IDAS: Intent Discovery with Abstractive Summarizationcited by 22
  5. 2021Generalized Zero-shot Intent Detection via Commonsense Knowledgecited by 21
  6. 2023Intent Induction from Conversations for Task-Oriented Dialogue Track at DSTC 11cited by 10
  7. 2022Watch the Neighbors: A Unified K-Nearest Neighbor Contrastive Learning Framework for OOD Intent Discoverycited by 9
  8. 2024Generate then Refine: Data Augmentation for Zero-shot Intent Detectioncited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.