mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Graph Generative Models Evaluation with Masked Autoencoder

arXiv 2503.13271 ↗First posted 17 Mar 2025cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, numerous graph generative models (GGMs) have been proposed. However, evaluating these models remains a considerable challenge, primarily due to the difficulty in extracting meaningful graph features that accurately represent real-world graphs. The traditional evaluation techniques, which rely on graph statistical properties like node degree distribution, clustering coefficients, or Laplacian spectrum, overlook node features and lack scalability. There are newly proposed deep learning-based methods employing graph random neural networks or contrastive learning to extract graph features, demonstrating superior performance compared to traditional statistical methods, but their experimental results also demonstrate that these methods do not always working well across different metrics. Although there are overlaps among these metrics, they are generally not interchangeable, each evaluating generative models from a different perspective. In this paper, we propose a novel method that leverages graph masked autoencoders to effectively extract graph features for GGM evaluations. We conduct extensive experiments on graphs and empirically demonstrate that our method can be more reliable and effective than previously proposed methods across a number of GGM evaluation metrics, such as "Fr'echet Distance (FD)" and "MMD Linear". However, no single method stands out consistently across all metrics and datasets. Therefore, this study also aims to raise awareness of the significance and challenges associated with GGM evaluation techniques, especially in light of recent advances in generative models.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Mar 2025.

Builds on

16 of 23 references.

References · 16

  1. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
  2. 2016Improved Techniques for Training GANscited by 2,938
  3. 2019Improved Precision and Recall Metric for Assessing Generative Modelscited by 925
  4. 2022GraphMAE: Self-Supervised Masked Graph Autoencoderscited by 443
  5. 2020Reliable Fidelity and Diversity Metrics for Generative Modelscited by 425
  6. 2018GraphRNN: Generating Realistic Graphs with Deep Auto-regressive Modelscited by 406
  7. 2018MolGAN: An implicit generative model for small molecular graphscited by 392
  8. 2018GraphVAE: Towards Generation of Small Graphs Using Variational Autoencoderscited by 375
  9. 2020Permutation Invariant Graph Generation via Score-Based Generative Modelingcited by 263
  10. 2021GraphDF: A Discrete Flow Model for Molecular Graph Generationcited by 177
  11. 2022What's Behind the Mask: Understanding Masked Graph Modeling for Graph Autoencoderscited by 82
  12. 2018An empirical study on evaluation metrics of generative adversarial networkscited by 81
4 more
  1. 2022A Survey on Deep Graph Generation: Methods and Applicationscited by 69
  2. 2022On Evaluation Metrics for Graph Generative Modelscited by 44
  3. 2021Evaluation Metrics for Graph Generative Models: Problems, Pitfalls, and Practical Solutionscited by 38
  4. 2022Evaluating Graph Generative Models with Contrastively Learned Featurescited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.