GC-Fed: Gradient Centralized Federated Learning with Partial Client Participation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated Learning (FL) enables privacy-preserving multi-source information fusion (MSIF) but is challenged by client drift in highly heterogeneous data settings. Many existing drift-mitigation strategies rely on reference-based techniques--such as gradient adjustments or proximal loss--that use historical snapshots (e.g., past gradients or previous global models) as reference points. When only a subset of clients participates in each training round, these historical references may not accurately capture the overall data distribution, leading to unstable training. In contrast, our proposed Gradient Centralized Federated Learning (GC-Fed) employs a hyperplane as a historically independent reference point to guide local training and enhance inter-client alignment. GC-Fed comprises two complementary components: Local GC, which centralizes gradients during local training, and Global GC, which centralizes updates during server aggregation. In our hybrid design, Local GC is applied to feature-extraction layers to harmonize client contributions, while Global GC refines classifier layers to stabilize round-wise performance. Theoretical analysis and extensive experiments on benchmark FL tasks demonstrate that GC-Fed effectively mitigates client drift and achieves up to a 20% improvement in accuracy under heterogeneous and partial participation conditions.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 48 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Mar 2025.
Builds on
48 of 73 references.
References · 48
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
- 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,987
- 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,965
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
- 2018Group Normalizationcited by 1,524
36 more
- 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,417
- 2020Adaptive Federated Optimizationcited by 1,046
- 2021Model-Contrastive Federated Learningcited by 766
- 2021Federated Learning Based on Dynamic Regularizationcited by 562
- 2014SAGA: A Fast Incremental Gradient Method With Support for Non-Strongly Convex Composite Objectivescited by 402
- 2021Gradient Projection Memory for Continual Learningcited by 348
- 2021No Fear of Heterogeneity: Classifier Calibration for Federated Learning with Non-IID Datacited by 241
- 2021FedBABU: Towards Enhanced Representation for Federated Image Classificationcited by 182
- 2013Minimizing Finite Sums with the Stochastic Average Gradientcited by 164
- 2020Federated Learning with Compression: Unified Analysis and Sharp Guaranteescited by 160
- 2022Generalized Federated Learning via Sharpness Aware Minimizationcited by 144
- 2021Local Learning Matters: Rethinking Data Heterogeneity in Federated Learningcited by 114
- 2022Federated Learning with Label Distribution Skew via Logits Calibrationcited by 109
- 2021Asynchronous Federated Learning on Heterogeneous Devices: A Surveycited by 93
- 2014Deep learning with Elastic Averaging SGDcited by 90
- 2021Preservation of the Global Knowledge by Not-True Distillation in Federated Learningcited by 87
- 2020Gradient Centralization: A New Optimization Technique for Deep Neural Networkscited by 82
- 2020Variance-Reduced Methods for Machine Learningcited by 79
- 2020Federated Learning via Posterior Averaging: A New Perspective and Practical Algorithmscited by 78
- 2022FedVARP: Tackling the Variance Due to Partial Client Participation in Federated Learningcited by 64
- 2020Faster Non-Convex Federated Learning via Global and Local Momentumcited by 48
- 2022Towards Understanding and Mitigating Dimensional Collapse in Heterogeneous Federated Learningcited by 46
- 2015Variance Reduced Stochastic Gradient Descent with Neighborscited by 39
- 2021Emerging Trends in Federated Learning: From Model Fusion to Federated X Learningcited by 35
- 2022Communication-Efficient Federated Learning with Accelerated Client Gradientcited by 24
- 2022AdaBest: Minimizing Client Drift in Federated Learning via Adaptive Bias Estimationcited by 21
- 2021Architectural Patterns for the Design of Federated Learning Systemscited by 17
- 2023FedSOL: Stabilized Orthogonal Learning with Proximal Restrictions in Federated Learningcited by 14
- 2023Guiding The Last Layer in Federated Learning with Pre-Trained Modelscited by 13
- 2024Not All Federated Learning Algorithms Are Created Equal: A Performance Evaluation Studycited by 10
- 2024Accelerating Heterogeneous Federated Learning with Closed-form Classifierscited by 10
- 2023Jointly Exploring Client Drift and Catastrophic Forgetting in Dynamic Learningcited by 5
- 2023Robust Feature Learning and Global Variance-Driven Classifier Alignment for Long-Tail Class Incremental Learningcited by 5
- 2025Understanding Federated Learning from IID to Non-IID dataset: An Experimental Studycited by 3
- 2021On Asymptotic Linear Convergence of Projected Gradient Descent for Constrained Least Squarescited by 2
- 2022FedFOR: Stateless Heterogeneous Federated Learning with First-Order Regularizationcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.