mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

TLAC: Two-stage LMM Augmented CLIP for Zero-Shot Classification

arXiv 2503.12206 ↗First posted 15 Mar 2025cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Contrastive Language-Image Pretraining (CLIP) has shown impressive zero-shot performance on image classification. However, state-of-the-art methods often rely on fine-tuning techniques like prompt learning and adapter-based tuning to optimize CLIP's performance. The necessity for fine-tuning significantly limits CLIP's adaptability to novel datasets and domains. This requirement mandates substantial time and computational resources for each new dataset. To overcome this limitation, we introduce simple yet effective training-free approaches, Single-stage LMM Augmented CLIP (SLAC) and Two-stage LMM Augmented CLIP (TLAC), that leverages powerful Large Multimodal Models (LMMs), such as Gemini, for image classification. The proposed methods leverages the capabilities of pre-trained LMMs, allowing for seamless adaptation to diverse datasets and domains without the need for additional training. Our approaches involve prompting the LMM to identify objects within an image. Subsequently, the CLIP text encoder determines the image class by identifying the dataset class with the highest semantic similarity to the LLM predicted object. Our models achieved superior accuracy on 9 of 11 base-to-novel datasets, including ImageNet, SUN397, and Caltech101, while maintaining a strictly training-free paradigm. Our TLAC model achieved an overall accuracy of 83.44%, surpassing the previous state-of-the-art few-shot methods by a margin of 6.75%. Compared to other training-free approaches, our TLAC method achieved 83.6% average accuracy across 13 datasets, a 9.7% improvement over the previous methods. Our Code is available at https://github.com/ans92/TLAC

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Mar 2025.

Builds on

39 of 52 references.

References · 39

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  3. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  4. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  5. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
  6. 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,151
  7. 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,131
  8. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
  9. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
  10. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
  11. 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,175
  12. 2023MiniGPT-4: Enhancing Vision-Language Understanding with Advanced Large Language Modelscited by 2,689
27 more
  1. 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Modelscited by 2,269
  2. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
  3. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
  4. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,701
  5. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
  6. 2022Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,427
  7. 2021CLIP-Adapter: Better Vision-Language Models with Feature Adapterscited by 1,021
  8. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,010
  9. 2021Florence: A New Foundation Model for Computer Visioncited by 802
  10. 2022AdaptFormer: Adapting Vision Transformers for Scalable Visual Recognitioncited by 714
  11. 2021P-Tuning v2: Prompt Tuning Can Be Comparable to Fine-tuning Universally Across Scales and Taskscited by 686
  12. 2022MaPLe: Multi-modal Prompt Learningcited by 685
  13. 2021Multimodal Few-Shot Learning with Frozen Language Modelscited by 657
  14. 2021FILIP: Fine-grained Interactive Language-Image Pre-Trainingcited by 626
  15. 2021DenseCLIP: Language-Guided Dense Prediction with Context-Aware Promptingcited by 530
  16. 2022Tip-Adapter: Training-free Adaption of CLIP for Few-shot Classificationcited by 355
  17. 2022Prompt-aligned Gradient for Prompt Tuningcited by 339
  18. 2022Visual Classification via Description from Large Language Modelscited by 331
  19. 2023Visual-Language Prompt Tuning with Knowledge-guided Context Optimizationcited by 307
  20. 2022What does a platypus look like? Generating customized prompts for zero-shot image classificationcited by 263
  21. 2022Prompt Distribution Learningcited by 235
  22. 2024Pixtral 12Bcited by 174
  23. 2024Does Prompt Formatting Have Any Impact on LLM Performance?cited by 132
  24. 2022SuS-X: Training-Free Name-Only Transfer of Vision-Language Modelscited by 118
  25. 2022LASP: Text-to-Text Optimization for Language-Aware Soft Prompting of Vision & Language Modelscited by 58
  26. 2023Read-only Prompt Optimization for Vision-Language Few-shot Learningcited by 58
  27. 2024Meta-Prompting for Automating Zero-shot Visual Recognition with LLMscited by 28

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Large Multimodal Models as General In-Context Classifiers
  2. 2025Meta CLIP 2: A Worldwide Scaling Recipe
  3. 2024LatteCLIP: Unsupervised CLIP Fine-Tuning via LMM-Synthetic Texts
  4. 2024Toward a Holistic Evaluation of Robustness in CLIP Models
  5. 2024What Do You See? Enhancing Zero-Shot Image Classification with Multimodal Large Language Models
  6. 2024LMM-Regularized CLIP Embeddings for Image Classification
  7. 2024CapS-Adapter: Caption-based MultiModal Adapter in Zero-Shot Classification
  8. 2025HQ-CLIP: Leveraging Large Vision-Language Models to Create High-Quality Image-Text Datasets and CLIP Models